Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mod suggestion for tomorrow


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Martin said:

Can we create two threads for the first pick, one for celebrating and one for whining? I would hate for the celebration thread to be overtaken by the few folks that has been spamming negativity in every thread the last few weeks. I’m usually very open to the back and forth, but let’s make tomorrow a fun one.

Bad idea since both sides will invade each others threads.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Martin said:

Can we create two threads for the first pick, one for celebrating and one for whining? I would hate for the celebration thread to be overtaken by the few folks that has been spamming negativity in every thread the last few weeks. I’m usually very open to the back and forth, but let’s make tomorrow a fun one.

Yeah.  That will work for sure.  No one will jump threads.  🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's quiet now but there's consensus among the mod team. We've been giving plenty of leeway leading up to the draft but after the draft it's on.

les-i-will-fuck-you-up.gif

 

I would like to personally request a week off if we pick Levis.  Volunteer it.  Want it.  I will probably quit my job and move to cabin in the West Va mountains and live a new way

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

I would like to personally request a week off if we pick Levis.  Volunteer it.  Want it.  I will probably quit my job and move to cabin in the West Va mountains and live a new way

if we draft Levis the huddle will actually explode so no banning needed

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...