Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You're the GM. 2023 Panthers Re-draft


Recommended Posts

A little post draft fun since there's not much happening until TC. Most of us, myself included, are pretty critical of our GMs and say we knew better. So here's an opportunity that we can revisit later to see who really did know better. We've seen how the draft fell so change our picks. Now's the opportunity to put your redraft on the record. Of course there's trades, etc. but for the sake of simplicity, I'm just going to keep our picks. So here's mine. 

(1)Anthony Richardson - If we're going to swing for the fences moving up to 1, I go for the highest ceiling. Ideally I'd like to trade down to 2 and pick up the 24' 1st they offered Chicago and still take AR, but I'll go with the pick here. 

(39) BJ Ojulari - We needed an edge rusher opposite Burns and one was right there for the taking. 

(93) Kelle Ringo - CB is a need too. Can't rely on DJ and JH to stay healthy and Henderson is a liability. We need help and here it is. 

(114) Chandler Zavala - Like this pick and see no need to change it. always invest in your offensive line. 

(132) Tyler Scott - Fast, athletic WR that will add to our WR room. 

(145) Antonio Johnson - Safety is a need and AJ has a similar style to Chinn if we can't end up keeping him. 

That's what I'd do on a draft redo. The positions taken actually stay the same, but who and where is obviously different. So who's your picks? Who's going to be worth picking and who isn't? Obviously I'm going to support all our current picks and BY is our QB. Just a little something to do while we wait. 

  • Poo 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

A little post draft fun since there's not much happening until TC. Most of us, myself included, are pretty critical of our GMs and say we knew better. So here's an opportunity that we can revisit later to see who really did know better. We've seen how the draft fell so change our picks. Now's the opportunity to put your redraft on the record. Of course there's trades, etc. but for the sake of simplicity, I'm just going to keep our picks. So here's mine. 

(1)Anthony Richardson - If we're going to swing for the fences moving up to 1, I go for the highest ceiling. Ideally I'd like to trade down to 2 and pick up the 24' 1st they offered Chicago and still take AR, but I'll go with the pick here. 

(39) BJ Ojulari - We needed an edge rusher opposite Burns and one was right there for the taking. 

(93) Kelle Ringo - CB is a need too. Can't rely on DJ and JH to stay healthy and Henderson is a liability. We need help and here it is. 

(114) Chandler Zavala - Like this pick and see no need to change it. always invest in your offensive line. 

(132) Tyler Scott - Fast, athletic WR that will add to our WR room. 

(145) Antonio Johnson - Safety is a need and AJ has a similar style to Chinn if we can't end up keeping him. 

That's what I'd do on a draft redo. The positions taken actually stay the same, but who and where is obviously different. So who's your picks? Who's going to be worth picking and who isn'tObviously I'm going to support all our current picks and BY is our QB. Just a little something to do while we wait. 

 1-Bryce Young (QB)

2- BJ Ojulari (Edge)

3. Nick Salvederi (T)

4. Charlie Jones (WR)

5. Karl Brooks (DL)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rodeo said:

If I was the GM this is what I would have done:

Round 1: Bryce Young, QB

Round 2: Will Anderson, Edge

Round 3: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR

Round 4: Devon Witherspoon, CB

Round 5: Paris Johnson Jr, OT

 

You forgot that you signed Dalton Kincaid as an UDFA. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...