Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers signing Yannick Ngakoue?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Fair enough, but is that really a need with Barno and Haynes?  Haynes had 5 sacks (and 20 solo tackles) on 41% of the defensive snap counts.  Burns had 12.5 sacks while playing 87% of the snap counts.  Mathematically, if Haynes played 87% of the snap counts he would have had 10.5 sacks.  Barno had 2 sacks while playing in just 9% of the defensive snaps.  Mathematically, he would have had over 18 sacks if given 87% of the snaps.  

While I realize this is math and not performance, it does suggest performance when given opportunity. 

Evero made a revealing comment when talking to Johnson.  "Ready to rush the passer?  You realize you gotta hold the edge first, right?"  At Strong OLB, we have YGM, the raw and unproven Johnson, and the raw, unproven, and undrafted Leota.  The strong OLB basically holds the edge with 2 gap run responsibility to the passer. The weak side OLB is the pure, "pin your ears back" pass rusher because he does not have edge responsibility like the strong.   In a spread offense you could have 2 weak OLB rushing the passer--but with the strong set, you have to hold the edge because there is a TE.  Personally, I think we are decent to potentially good at WOLB, totally unproven at SOLB.

So the need is not for a situational pass rusher (although we can upgrade there as we can any position), the need is for strong OLB--those that hold the edge.  That is how I understand it. 

Thanks. That was a very good detailed and informative summary about the duties the edge rusher / LB positions.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Fair enough, but is that really a need with Barno and Haynes?  Haynes had 5 sacks (and 20 solo tackles) on 41% of the defensive snap counts.  Burns had 12.5 sacks while playing 87% of the snap counts.  Mathematically, if Haynes played 87% of the snap counts he would have had 10.5 sacks.  Barno had 2 sacks while playing in just 9% of the defensive snaps.  Mathematically, he would have had over 18 sacks if given 87% of the snaps.  

While I realize this is math and not performance, it does suggest performance when given opportunity. 

Evero made a revealing comment when talking to Johnson.  "Ready to rush the passer?  You realize you gotta hold the edge first, right?"  At Strong OLB, we have YGM, the raw and unproven Johnson, and the raw, unproven, and undrafted Leota.  The strong OLB basically holds the edge with 2 gap run responsibility to the passer. The weak side OLB is the pure, "pin your ears back" pass rusher because he does not have edge responsibility like the strong.   In a spread offense you could have 2 weak OLB rushing the passer--but with the strong set, you have to hold the edge because there is a TE.  Personally, I think we are decent to potentially good at WOLB, totally unproven at SOLB.

So the need is not for a situational pass rusher (although we can upgrade there as we can any position), the need is for strong OLB--those that hold the edge.  That is how I understand it. 

Great post, helps clarify our current situation on defense I think.  Not huge fan of trying to extrapolate such limited numbers of sacks to increased usage in that linear way, but great points all-around and on what we really need.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Why though? He has only played one fulll season his entire career (9 seasons)

Honestly, I think Clowney has always been more name than real player.

Everybody remembers that one big college highlight, but if you want to name a pro highlight of his, it's not so easy.

The knock that he made a load of money off of one clip has some validity to it.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Honestly, I think Clowney has always been more name than real player.

Everybody remembers that one big college highlight, but if you want to name a pro highlight of his, it's not so easy.

The knock that he made a load of money off of one clip has some validity to it.

Clowney is an "A" Run defender and a "C" pass rusher.

He's like Reggie Bush. He wasn't worth the high pick, but he has had a solid career and isn't a bust. He'd be a plus add to our line and would probably get more sacks than rookie DJ Johnson. 

I wouldn't be against adding Floyd, Clowney, or Ngakoue, but between the three Clowney is probably the most well balanced. 

Wouldn't pay nearly what he thinks he's probably worth though. 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember people complaining about Reddick's run defense too. Now they wish we had kept him.

We need situational pass rush help still if possible. Evero will have different packages. There will inevitably be an adjustment period either way with the switch to 3-4 we should be prepared for that anyway.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Honestly, I think Clowney has always been more name than real player.

Everybody remembers that one big college highlight, but if you want to name a pro highlight of his, it's not so easy.

The knock that he made a load of money off of one clip has some validity to it.

Clowney finished 4-5 in the Heisman voting that year…. Before the famous hit.  Obv that hit got a lot of praise, but he was an elite DE in college.

Unfortunately for clowney, he had to have micro fracture knee surgery when he got to the NFL, which ends lots of careers 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jfra78 said:

Can you believe this guy was supposed to be the next Peppers

Dude was a number 1 overall pick. Just goes to show just because majority agree on a players as a consensus doesn't mean they are right or that guy is guaranteed to be good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Clowney is an "A" Run defender and a "C" pass rusher.

He's like Reggie Bush. He wasn't worth the high pick, but he has had a solid career and isn't a bust. He'd be a plus add to our line and would probably get more sacks than rookie DJ Johnson. 

I wouldn't be against adding Floyd, Clowney, or Ngakoue, but between the three Clowney is probably the most well balanced. 

Wouldn't pay nearly what he thinks he's probably worth though. 

Like was mentioned above though, how many games do you expect to get out of Clowney If you sign him?

29 minutes ago, mcsmoak said:

Clowney finished 4-5 in the Heisman voting that year…. Before the famous hit.  Obv that hit got a lot of praise, but he was an elite DE in college.

Unfortunately for clowney, he had to have micro fracture knee surgery when he got to the NFL, which ends lots of careers 

And therein lies the issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frankw said:

I remember people complaining about Reddick's run defense too. Now they wish we had kept him.

We need situational pass rush help still if possible. Evero will have different packages. There will inevitably be an adjustment period either way with the switch to 3-4 we should be prepared for that anyway.

I don’t wish we had kept him. You can’t bookend a defensive front 7 with Burns and Reddick. Didn’t work, won’t work, can’t work. He was going to get starter money…you only have so much money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDGE JADEVEON CLOWNEY

The Panthers added Oregon edge defender DJ Johnson in the third round of the draft and have a few other young pieces on the roster, but if they want this loaded defense to truly be among the league’s best, they can’t have a potential weak link on the defensive line opposite Brian Burns.

Clowney is coming off a down year in the pass-rushing department, totaling only 29 pressures and two sacks, but a change of scenery could allow him to thrive again, similar to his first year in Cleveland. Clowney is one of the best run-defending edges in the NFL over the past decade and should benefit from a lot of talent around him.

New Panthers defensive coordinator Ejiro Evero has historically deployed a 3-4 base defense, and that is the expectation going forward, but the defense will be multiple in 2023 and Clowney has experience in both fronts. He would also be returning to the area he grew up in and where he played college football at South Carolina.

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-landing-spots-best-remaining-free-agents-2023-nfl-draft

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...