Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Simms top 40 QB's


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Lot of scouts had Richardson #1, CJ #2 and Young #3. 

 

I'll also add that if Young was 6-2 or taller and weighed 230ish, that wouldn't be the case. He'd be a clear cut #1 most years with prototype size 

Maybe on madden.

But in the NFL.  Little to none did.

 

”Affer talking to all my sources with all the teams across the league.  There is a Consensus QB1 in this draft (Bryce)”

- Daniel Jeremiah, former NFL scout, current NFL draft insider for NFL network etc

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

All of those receivers have had locker room episodes, sidelines eruptions, or cussed out their QB in front of the team.

 

The definition of diva is subjective, but the behaviors all of the above have shown… are diva like in my opinion. 

I do think the diva WR era is a recognizable era/window in the NFL.   I could see it returning though.  Especially as the league continues to become a passing league, social media, personal brand building etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

 

I was pretty sure Anderson was going to be drafted early, but I agree with Simms that Anderson isn't as good of a prospect as he was built up to be.  I think if the Cardinals scheme him to the QB he will put up good numbers.  But if they expect him to beat tackles on his own week in and week out, they are going to be disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SazmoRanger said:

I disagree. At least USC had Carson Palmer who actually had a pretty good career. Sure he’s not a HOFer, but he had 10+ year career in the NFL as a starter. Ohio State hasn’t produced a QB of that caliber AT ALL, in any round. 
 

Either way, it’s pretty interesting to have two power house schools like that who practically never produce any NFL talent at the QB position.  

Palmer was decent but Leinart, Sanchez and Darnold have been terrible and were all drafted higher. Jury is still out on Fields, so he and Palmer potentially cancel each other out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CRA said:

Chris Simms had Zach Wilson ahead of Trevor Lawrence.  Mond ahead of Fields. 

Simms has always embraced throwing rankings out meant to generate clicks 

Exactly.  Did you see his edge rankings for this draft?  He entirely throws stuff out there to get attention.   Anyone who thinks AR is going to be a better qb than Young this coming season are probably pushing for clicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I’m not mad at all. It’s just a silly thing to say. It’s serves zero relevance to actuality and it’s assumption that can’t be validated.

Somebody said Bryce was the #1 QB in college. I pointed out Williams was better. So it was relevant to the conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tom Brady cussed out his teammates and refs his entire career.

 

Nobody called him a diva. 

 

So you basically think most of the players in the NFL are divas because those actions happen every day. It's football bro did you not play in high school?

we dont have to see eye to eye here.... and MANY people called Brady a diva.. 

 

Relax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...