Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we stop blaming Kasey


Panther53521
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Unfortunately for Kasay and Mike Tolbert, two stand-up guys who were a big reason there was a Super Bowl to care about in the first place, their legacies are often defined by a kickoff out of bounds and a fumble.

Tolbert actually fumbled twice in the Super Bowl, and he was a roster albatross from 2015 on. Almost got TD killed on that onside kick recovery vs Seattle by not hitting anyone and contacted literally no one three different times on Ginn's TD run vs the Cardinals. His 2015 legacy is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

 

It's always been this way. Too many ppl think they are capable of out Trolling a Troll. Well, that and the fact that we have more than our fair share of Trolls to begin with.

You are a part timer troll yourself there bub. Kind of the pot calling the kettle black aint' it? But yeah, the guy in question I do believe is somewhat mentally challenged so I try to cut him a little slack and just gif meme him back for fun. We are all trolls to a degree, just some days some of us decide to act out a little more than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was too clutch his entire career to forgive him for that kick.  Great kickers don't kick the ball out of bounds in the Superbowl having just tied the game with less than a minute to go.  Vinitari would never had done it. Would we have won if he had kicked it out of the end zone? Who knows, but we probably go to overtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't obsess over that Super Bowl. If the NFL network shows it, I watch .... turning it off right after Proehl's touchdown.  We lost one of the greatest Super Bowls ever played. What can you do?

On the other hand, I have never re-watched one second of Super Bowl 50.  Too traumatic.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John had never kicked a ball out of bounds and he chose THAT moment. I’ve moved past it but I will never forget that. It took the wind out of our sail. Maybe our defense wouldn’t have stopped Tom but he would’ve had to make a longer drive, felt like he basically got the ball at midfield. 
 

it was just frustrating bc the guys played their @$$es off just for the ball to be kicked out of bounds lol 

 

We had honestly grabbed momentum those last few possessions of the game. In my opinion. 

Edited by LordOfDaWingz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

Yes the kickoff out of bounds was a mistake, but even if the Pats had to start inside the 20, they still had a good chance to get close enough for the FG.

the Stadium was warm that day, and you can tell by the way all scores where in late 1st half and 4 quarter.

our great defense didn’t sack Brady

Pats had the ball for 39 mins

We allowed 481 yards on defense

we started going to 2 points to early

our defense was extremely tired

we had a hell of a chance to win with all this going against us.

Please stop blaming Kasey, if not for him that year and his winning FG’s all year long, we would not even been in the Super Bowl 

Yes, should’ve kicked the extra points, but that’s not guaranteed points.

Love JK but that kick was awful, you could feel/see the momentum just turn on a dime. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched this game about 3 days ago  on NFL network.  I swear I thought we were going to win. 

Time of possession was what hurt us the most in this game.  39 min to 21 min. It didn't feel that way watching it live , because we were scoring. Our defense was zapped. Tired. 
Many of us agree,  we gave Brady too much time at the end.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • wow.  You know folks on the huddle are desperate when this sort of shi is being used to pump themselves up.
    • I don't care all that much about stats. What I care about is how did he look on the field, and that was poor-to-average for everything but the second half of the GB game. Carolina was losing every game... of course there were some passing stats generated.  What is missing here is quantification of how many times these QBs showed something worthwhile justifying the #1 pick. That Manning season gets tossed out a lot, and while there were a lot of interceptions and not many wins, Manning absolutely looked like an NFL QB that just needed some seasoning to take the next step, which he did that following year. Bryce had little to none of that on an individual basis.  While this is an interesting table, it tells only a fraction of the story. 
    • I thought Winston was going to be a 10-15 year problem, sooo glad he went the better josh Freeman route. I mean prime Ryan, brees, and if Winston became that guy........Id hate to be a DC for Carolina.   The main deal is 1st overall pick goto the worse teams.  Looking at the list only Burrow has been able to break the loser mentally fog over those teams. Goff was reborn for the lions and you could make a case for him, but 2nd team. Luck and Cam are about the same, injuries ended great runs.  Burrow should get more MVP votes.
×
×
  • Create New...