Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we stop blaming Kasey


Panther53521
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

The Cam fumble thing is way overblown imo. 

He didn't dive on the ball for two reasons. 1. He was anticipating the ball changing direction. 2. He was too tall to just drop immediately on top of it. 

False - Cam made a business decision to not dive on the fumble and admitted this in an interview.  

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Those topics have been beaten to death since the spring

you're spending your time on the wrong site if you don't wanna talk about that stuff over something that happened 20 years ago lmfao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GOAT said:

it's 2023.

we're a couple weeks away from our new #1 pick QB and new coaching staff taking the field.

and the number one thread on this forum is about something that happened in 2003.

woo boy.

Its a Panthers message board right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, djp14 said:

I didn't like the call, but I understood it.

Up until that td drive, we had 130 yards in total offense.  And it was the 4th quarter. Bottom line, if we convert the first 2 pt conversion, we eventually have a 25-21 lead, and probably win the game. If we only converted the 2nd, we probably go to OT.

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

Yeah, about cheating our way to a superbowl ,cause Sauerbran and Donnely were caught using steroids, and the national media framed it like a team wide issue 

Op is right though, those 20 yards meant nothing to Brady and Welker , they were going to nickel and dime our gassed defense if they got it at the 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2023 at 11:05 AM, OneBadCat said:

Link?

He can’t provide one because it’s false. He said in an interview he anticipated it bouncing out and that’s why he raised up. He couldn’t get there before the defender that was already lower than him so he was playing the bounce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Newton would go on to explain a day later: “I didn’t dive on one fumble because the way my leg was (positioned). It could have been contorted in a way. You say my effort? I didn’t dive down. I fumbled—that’s fine. That’s fine. We didn’t lose the game because of that fumble.”

https://www.si.com/nfl/2016/02/11/cam-newton-dive-fumble-super-bowl-50-carolina-panthers-nfl

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

Yep, people forget that…
If we kick the PAT’s, then NE doesn’t go for 2 and make it. That’s a 3 point swing and their final drive is for a tie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...