Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trying to trade Corral?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Or a Raidah. 
I think the only shot at Corral having value of any kind right now, is maybe there is someone that really liked him as a project but the  Panthes beat them to him . We probably know who it could be, since we had to trade in front of them. 
 

I think Chinn is the more realistic chip from tne trading chips stack, because he is an established talent that may be without a home in a new scheme.

Plus, I forget who but just in the last day or two, a paid observer referred to him as the (big?) nickle back “right now”.
That “right now”, stood out. 
Said as if they knew something might be in the wind?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ncfan said:

C8FC28A7-0DA2-433C-A3CC-AF4BC90F40B1.jpeg

To me this looks like speculation.  No where has it ever been mentioned about us looking to trade Corral.  

IMO trading Corral is a bad idea. 

1 we wouldn't get much more than a 5th or 6th rounder out of him because he doesn't have much tape. 

2. He's going to be a good QB once he gets some experience.

3. Dalton is old and injury prone.

4. It's too early to know if Young is going to survive the NFL.  One or two nasty hits could be a problem and if we let Corral go we are right back where we started. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

To me this looks like speculation.  No where has it ever been mentioned about us looking to trade Corral.  

IMO trading Corral is a bad idea. 

1 we wouldn't get much more than a 5th or 6th rounder out of him because he doesn't have much tape. 

2. He's going to be a good QB once he gets some experience.

3. Dalton is old and injury prone.

4. It's too early to know if Young is going to survive the NFL.  One or two nasty hits could be a problem and if we let Corral go we are right back where we started. 

Kunkel sux 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need to keep Corral, he's essentially our Kirk Cousins just taken a year earlier.  Nobody is going to give us anything great for him right now, might as well keep him as an upside project in case Bryce's size causes injury problems.

Either Bryce stays healthy, Corral stays on our bench for 2 more years, and we miss out on the 4th or 5th round pick that we MIGHT have been able to get for him now.

Or Bryce gets hurt and Corral becomes a legit player for us like Cousins did once RG3 went down.

Third option would be like Jimmy G and we end up being able to trade him later for a decent pick because he played a little and looked good.

Either way, for what we'd get for him now, I think keeping him for any of the above reasons makes the most sense at the moment.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Bryce gets hurt and Corral becomes a legit player for us like Cousins did once RG3 went down.

IMO this helps having Corral around.  Young size is and always will be a concern.  There isn't a LB or DE in this league that isn't going to miss a shot at lighting him up because he a smaller QB. 

The Kirk Cousin comparison is a good one.  I think given reps Corral is going to be a solid backup and possible start one day. Whether with the Panthers or someone else. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...