Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaycee Horn expected to miss multiple weeks


jamos14
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

What’s really going to be infuriating is if they did and The Fitterer said no. 

I can't recall his name ever coming up. I recall it being reported that the Bears wanted Burns, Brown, or Moore which makes sense and it being reported or maybe suggested that we were trying to get them to bite on Chinn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

He will play in 9 games for us this year, and be traded next season to the pats or niners or Steelers for a 3rd round pick and never miss another game for 10 years, and average 8 picks a year and score multiple defensive touchdowns. 

Crazy that we all know this is what’s going to happen.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

https://x.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1701615196211446213?s=20


And our next 3 matchups at WR:

New Orleans - Olave / Thomas 

Seattle - Metcalf / Lockett / Smith-Njigba

Minnesota - Jefferson

 

We are screwed.  This secondary is about to be torched.

keep going and you see Detroit and then (gulp) Miami

 

Who we beating out of those teams?    Seattle on the road?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Varking said:

Fields after a wonky week 1 is 15th in rushing for the whole NFl and 16th in passing yards. Combine the two and he’s 6th in total yards for a QB right now. 

Chicagos issues are not Fields.  They are the offensive and defensive lines.  Well their D in general.  They might be in for a long season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Chicagos issues are not Fields.  They are the offensive and defensive lines.  Well their D in general.  They might be in for a long season. 

uhh... oline isnt their issue...

image.png.98fc1ccb9e77de214ef928281e1b4b54.png

 

fields was only pressured 4 times against the packers, and was never hit or hurried. His sacks were from him trying to scramble and not getting back to LOS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

keep going and you see Detroit and then (gulp) Miami

 

Who we beating out of those teams?    Seattle on the road?

Evero needs a scheme to cover for the coverage deficiency.  And Burns better have his best games.

 

I still have nightmares with Benwikere on Julio or Keith Taylor on Mike Evans last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, joemac said:

Chicagos issues are not Fields.  They are the offensive and defensive lines.  Well their D in general.  They might be in for a long season. 

I imagine when they get Jenkins back on the line they won’t have him under pressure on 35 of 42 drop backs or whatever it was. He’s a beast when healthy but he’s often not healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Panthering said:

Can't predict injuries but we passed on Micah Parsons, Patrick Surtain, and Rashawn Slater for Horn. Parsons is already on a HoF trajectory and the other two are stud starters. Sheesh man. More CJ Henderson = another loss or two coming our way than normal. He's horrible

Horn is also a stud starter. We hit on the pick. Injury is just injury. Can’t blame anyone for it. poo happens. 

 

Yeah it sucks that other stud starters were picked that have been more fortunate, but I would only care on passing on those if Horn was trash, but dude is an all pro talent. He’s just unlucky, or the added physically of the pro game doesn’t agree with his body. And you don’t know that until you know that. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...