Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Run the Ball Reich


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Because they will "ram it up the gut" on 1st and 2nd down, then throw out of the shotgun. You have to mix up play calls out of the same formations to keep the defense off of their mark, similar to what allowed Sam to really thrive in 2022. 

You don't run out of an under center look and then go shotgun to throw every time like we saw. There is zero flow to play calling right now and it's like Reich is shooting from the hip. They need to get Bryce comfortable with running the pass game and run game from under center.

 

This guy knows his football 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders looks like he is running through mud and Chuba can't catch out of the backfield. The "offensive line" is supposed to be better run blockers then pass blockers, haven't seen it. As it stands now, they are a subpar group. 

Cant sustain a running game by constantly going up the middle for two yards.

Just the reality of the situation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reich did try to run the ball last night but wasn't successful on 1st or 2nd down and expected Bryce to save us on 3rd and long. I think the real issue is our interior offensive line. Christensen is done for the year, Corbett is out. We got a rookie and an undrafted free agent at both guards. These guys were beat left and right and couldn't open up any holes for Sanders. Philly's line is one of the best in the league and any RB can run behind it. 

This team is devoid of talent at the moment and I do blame Fitt for lack of depth at positions. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The entire opposing D is within 10 yards of the LOS most plays. We had a 3rd and 9 last night and the Saints had 9 men on the LOS and the safeties were standing at the first down sticks. Until we can create some sort of down field threat life is going to be very difficult on offense. Defenses are just keying on the run and short passing game because that's all we've been able to execute so far.

Which is why it's so weird we're not trying to stretch the defense horizontally.  We don't have the personnel to stretch vertically (arguably do with Mingo and Chark meeting potential), but are still running triangle concepts that the defense is easily diagnosing.  

I have officially given up on TMJ however.  

Reich was able to open guys up in the middle of the field for Rivers and Wentz with that Hi-Lo and mesh stuff and we're just not really doing any of that.  Lots of snag routes or plays where everyone's leaning one way and ~one guy to dump off to the counter.  We're just not not isolating the right guys or designing for favorable matchups with our personnel. 

And then in that, without the ability to get decent separation, the 3 on 2s Reich likes to make get obliterated pretty quickly with Marshall tripping on his dick.

My take is that we absolutely need Shenault in there right now along with a burner RB; need to have a hard focus on stretching things out to open the flat for Bryce.     

They gave us all these fluff pieces (like below), but reality is, Reich is still just using Reich.  Very little from the McVay/Shanahan tree.

https://www.panthers.com/news/how-thomas-brown-and-frank-reich-blended-offensive-philosophies

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

19 rushes total with only 10 coming from your $24 million running back isn't going to win games Reich. Get it together.

Sanders didn't need more touches.  Hubbard did.  He didn't get a rush until the 4th quarter.   And he drastically out played Sanders week 1. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I wish people would stop referencing Darnold last year like he had some come to Jesus moment with Wilks. 
Any person with a lick of sense would see that Wilks and co did everything they could to make Darnold not a factor because they couldn’t trust him. 
Also the Saints game. 

They did what would make Darnold successful, which is play action pass. And guess what? Bryce has the LOWEST QBR in the league right now which, to my best recollection, Sam never had, even with the poo show that was the Jets with Gase and Rhule here.

So there is that. Flame Darnold all you want but he was Top 10 in QBR down the stretch, and we won that game against the Saints, unlike last night, because of Wilks philosophical change on offense.

You've disproven your own argument now run along, you have a Bryce Fan Club meeting at noon.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Sanders didn't need more touches.  Hubbard did.  He didn't get a rush until the 4th quarter.   And he drastically out played Sanders week 1. 

Yea I didn't understand the lack of Hubbard this week. 

He was in mostly on 3rd downs and obviously passing plays, the great receiver that he is. 

Exciting to see if Cohen is back. Definitely will be an adding boost to this offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jmac said:

Sanders looks like he is running through mud and Chuba can't catch out of the backfield. The "offensive line" is supposed to be better run blockers then pass blockers, haven't seen it. As it stands now, they are a subpar group. 

Cant sustain a running game by constantly going up the middle for two yards.

Just the reality of the situation.

May need to revise your opinion on Hubbard.  He was our second leading receiver last night.  Here's the stat line:

image.png.ad807b0eee658de97cef72b76593532a.png

In fact, Chuba has caught all 7 of his targets this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...