Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Johnson?


ATLpanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Mingo was 39 and DJ was in the 3rd right?

Yeah.

Ideally, I was thinking this draft could’ve been good to trade down slightly in the 2nd with a packaged late rounder—could gain a pick in the 75-80 range without losing 93. Easier said than done but it seemed we were either trading up or standing out at 39 seeing our draft room videos. I just thought there was too much talent at RB, TE, DB and EDGE to lose more picks in that top-120 range.

Mingo was an internet favorite but I thought his high was maybe 50-60ish. Had him going to KC in late R2.

I will say, Fitt’s picks leave the same taste Gettleman’s did. On one end—Online and “expert” rankings aren’t that far off at the end of the day. There’s legit intel and you do get a good sense of consensus boards, and then so many of our early mid-rounders (like DJ) are like “who’s that guy?”

Then we say, “we’ll I’m sure the team knows what they’re doing, we’re just fans and prognosticators” and then a lot of the guys we liked do well and we’re scratching our heads.

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

He's likely insurance for 2024 in case we no longer have Houston and/or YGM on the roster.

I agree that's not what we should be looking for in the 3rd round, but I see the potential need.

Fitt doesnt need to be trading up for a 25 year old project that may help us a year from now.  Especially with all of the holes on the roster. 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah.

Ideally, I was thinking this draft could’ve been good to trade down slightly in the 2nd with a packaged late rounder—could gain a pick in the 75-80 range without losing 93. Easier said than done but it seemed we were either trading up or standing out at 39 seeing our draft room videos. I just thought there was too much talent at RB, TE, DB and EDGE to lose more picks in that top-120 range.

Mingo was an internet favorite but I thought his high was maybe 50-60ish. Had him going to KC in late R2.

I will say, Fitt’s picks leave the same taste Gettleman’s did. On one end—Online and “expert” rankings aren’t that far off at the end of the day. There’s legit intel and you do get a good sense of consensus boards, and then so many of our early mid-rounders (like DJ) are like “who’s that guy?”

Then we say, “we’ll I’m sure the team knows what they’re doing, we’re just fans and prognosticators” and then a lot of the guys we liked do well and we’re scratching our heads.

difference is with gettleman, we were winning games and it was entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah.

Ideally, I was thinking this draft could’ve been good to trade down slightly in the 2nd with a packaged late rounder—could gain a pick in the 75-80 range without losing 93. Easier said than done but it seemed we were either trading up or standing out at 39 seeing our draft room videos. I just thought there was too much talent at RB, TE, DB and EDGE to lose more picks in that top-120 range.

Mingo was an internet favorite but I thought his high was maybe 50-60ish. Had him going to KC in late R2.

I will say, Fitt’s picks leave the same taste Gettleman’s did. On one end—Online and “expert” rankings aren’t that far off at the end of the day. There’s legit intel and you do get a good sense of consensus boards, and then so many of our early mid-rounders (like DJ) are like “who’s that guy?”

Then we say, “we’ll I’m sure the team knows what they’re doing, we’re just fans and prognosticators” and then a lot of the guys we liked do well and we’re scratching our heads.

I don’t think Mingo should have gone that high anyway. Never even had a 1k yard season in Kiffins offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJ Johnson is the type of pick the Dolphins or Rams or Eagles can make. High athletic ceiling but the floor is the basement. Then again, they are where they are by not making dumb picks. If you're going to take a guy basically solely on athletic upside, make sure he's no in his mid-20s already. DJ Johnson is basically the same age as Brian Burns who is entering his 5th NFL season. There's only an 18 month difference. Marinate on that. That's not the type of "upside" pick you want to gamble on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I've hit several 10-12 legs this year and was doing really well with like 4 leg+100 built a decent bankroll but trying to hit a few big ones in the playoffs. Had San Fran and Buffalo mls and parlayed that and missed out on 1000 bucks in the jags game because meyers got shut down. I'm not too happy that hampton said he was 100% and his odds were what they were and it looks like he's not going to play much
    • If an OT falls to us in the draft that could start Week 1, then you take him without question.  Gives us a LT for the season since Ickey is likely to miss all of it (even if he can come back late in the season, it's hard to just step in and play well in that situation, so might as well just take the lost season) and then gives us options in 2027 when Moton might be done. I'd rather use the 1st on a defensive player, but if we can lock down a starting OL on a rookie deal for the next 4 years, you have to take it.
×
×
  • Create New...