Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good Drinking Material - Zavala stats


theguy
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, 96Bravo said:

It's funny because you'd think his familiarity with Icky would be a positive.

They played 5 games together in college. Zavala was transferred during the summer, later got injured so they barely trained and played together. BC have played and trained more with Ickey than Zavala have. 

 

Chandler Zavala will return to NC State after NCAA overturns waiver decision (fayobserver.com)

Edited by kass
changed from 7 to 5 games, according to an article
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Panthering said:

Trial by fire, I feel for him but it’s good learning experience.  Hopefully he grows from this. 

You don’t throw rookie olinemen out there to learn on the fly when you’ve traded the farm for a tiny QB. I swear, I really don’t think our front office has a clue what they’re doing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Backup rookie starting game 1 on opposite side than where he played the majority of preseason is doing poorly? Color me shocked.

Are we really expecting a 4th round lineman to be thrown into a starting gig at the very last minute to be playing well?  What does he have...10 padded practices as the starter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...