Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Bailey says Tepper isnt happy, wants changes now.


CPF4LIFE
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CBDellinger said:

If Tepper steps aside that would mean making his wife to step aside too... y'all think that's gonna happen?  

 

I can’t remember who said it, but someone in the national sports media referred to “Panthers owners, David and Nichole Tepper” a few months ago. I’ve never heard the wife included when mentioning a team owner. It’s obvious Tepper is pushing this progressive virtue signaling by including Nichole in the decision making for the team. He has turned this franchise into an absolute circus. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

So our head coach does not have the authority to move a player to another position as he sees fit?

Your Head Coach's authority stops at play calling. He didn't hire half of his own staff. 

Edit: I will add, he can move folks around on the depth chart. This particular subject was halted because the front office did not have an viable option to replace him with at LT. Reich wanted him at Guard. 

Edited by Leaky_Faucet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

How do these rumors always end up getting out? Also, I always find it funny when owners are pissed and want changes…you’re the owner bruv, do something about it poo stack. 

All I ever hear reports of is Tepper complaining about his product HE built. If you have such brass balls, do something about it. Make a splash. Fire Reich midseason Tepper, do it, you won't. Lil bitch.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

I heard Frank wanted AR    

Unfortunately, we will never know and rest assured, Reich will take the fall

Tepper won’t   Fitterer might but Frank will certainly because he didn’t ‘coach him up’

why Reich wants to put up with this poo at his age is beyond me 

Same. I heard if it wasn’t Bryce it was going to be AR and not Stroud 

So the one who’s succeeding the most right now we had the least desire for… go figure 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

I can’t remember who said it, but someone in the national sports media referred to “Panthers owners, David and Nichole Tepper” a few months ago. I’ve never heard the wife included when mentioning a team owner. It’s obvious Tepper is pushing this progressive virtue signaling by including Nichole in the decision making for the team. He has turned this franchise into an absolute circus. 

“Progressive virtue signaling” 

 

lmao my god give me a fugging break

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

I can’t remember who said it, but someone in the national sports media referred to “Panthers owners, David and Nichole Tepper” a few months ago. I’ve never heard the wife included when mentioning a team owner. It’s obvious Tepper is pushing this progressive virtue signaling by including Nichole in the decision making for the team. He has turned this franchise into an absolute circus. 

This will be Nicole’s organization one day. It’s very much a Dave AND Nicole thing

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Same. I heard if it wasn’t Bryce it was going to be AR and not Stroud 

As I said in March. I can assure you, Reich wanted Carr. The Panthers even speaking with Carr was out of encouragement by Reich to sit down and talk to him. I don't know who Reich wanted in the draft. I heard Stroud first but then everything started running together a few weeks prior to draft night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Coheed said:

Incompetence obviously? You’re literally taking some months old quote in passing as some sort of evidence for some type of agenda. Keep political BS from the football forum. 

I mean he's not wrong. Nicole is part of every decision the "owner" makes, including who we drafted #1.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Same. I heard if it wasn’t Bryce it was going to be AR and not Stroud 

So the one who’s succeeding the most right now we had the least desire for… go figure 

He has 7 TDs through 3 games, so I'd say he's doing alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...