Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Agent 89 does it again


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Stuart Smith said:

Actually, yes. He was very high on Shi Smith his rookie year. 

Not really. He was simply rooting for the kid and took a personal stock in him.

1 hour ago, CBDellinger said:

Hilarious but wildly unprofessional on 89s part.  

Y'all keep on saying this, but I don't see it. He explained himself---what and why he called Jeudy over, and then he reported what happened. And, finally, he ended on a pointed analysis of Jeudy's problem with criticism (which has been documented).

40 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

He is also very high on Mingo… 

Scared 30 Rock GIF by HULU

Dude, he thought Mingo had some upside, especially with contested balls. He was high on D.J. Moore 

37 minutes ago, Billy Love said:

Steve Smith calling out someone for not being mentally strong enough to handle constructive criticism is an absolute joke. Steve Smith is pitiful. 

Still the hate for 89, I see. 

Nobody ever had to criticize Smith for having a bad work ethic. He may have been criticized, but never for being a standout receiver. Jeudy needs criticism, and he's gotten it twice this week from two pretty good ex-football players, one a legend.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...