Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Miles Sanders on the 4th and 2


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

What did they see in this dude to warrant that fat 4 year contract? 

To some degree we have to also hold the OL, and IMO some of the early play-calling as reasons for ''some'' of his struggles. 

It's clear the lack in talent here on the OL (primarily injured starters) / scheme hurts Miles, considering the OL, and the Read-Option aspect to take the 11th defender out of run plays there is much less room to run in this offense. 

We are worse at running ''in general'' Chuba IMO is just a better inside runner than Miles so he's still able to get pieces here and there. 

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miles Sanders was rated THE worst receiving RB in the NFL last year.    That's out of every RB that saw the field.  PFF is flawed.  But when they tell you someone is THE worst at something in all the league......there is something there.  He also rated very poorly in that regard in prior seasons. 

The Eagles beat writers covered his career of unreliable and inconsistent play.  It was always something.  Bad routes, bad hands, fumbles, etc. 

This front office is just bad.  I don't even blame the players.  They have come here and been basically all the same versions of themselves but in a bad offense w/ bad coaching. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CRA said:

Miles Sanders was rated THE worst receiving RB in the NFL last year.    That's out of every RB that saw the field.  PFF is flawed.  But when they tell you someone is THE worst at something in all the league......there is something there.  He also rated very poorly in that regard in prior seasons. 

The Eagles beat writers covered his career of unreliable and inconsistent play.  It was always something.  Bad routes, bad hands, fumbles, etc. 

This front office is just bad.  I don't even blame the players.  They have come here and been basically all the same versions of themselves but in a bad offense w/ bad coaching. 

Same with Hurst. The MFer has been on way better offenses than this and was a dud. But somehow we are gonna be the exception? Riiight.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Same with Hurst. The MFer has been on way better offenses than this and was a dud. But somehow we are gonna be the exception? Riiight.

 

But when I say Ian Thomas is our best tight end I get poo'd left and right. The dude sucks, so does tremble, so does Thomas, so does Sullivan.  Te's are straight trash

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, toldozer said:

But when I say Ian Thomas is our best tight end I get poo'd left and right. The dude sucks, so does tremble, so does Thomas, so does Sullivan.  Te's are straight trash

100%. This is the worst group of TE's our franchise has ever fielded. Not many of them will be in the NFL long after they are gone from here.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, toldozer said:

But when I say Ian Thomas is our best tight end I get poo'd left and right. The dude sucks, so does tremble, so does Thomas, so does Sullivan.  Te's are straight trash

Tremble wasn't terrible yesterday. I think a lot of people forget he was a blocking TE that caught a few passes here and there in college. The passing game was never his forte. It was always something he was going to need to work on and develop. Too bad work on and develop can be said of pretty much every pick under the Rhule era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Tremble wasn't terrible yesterday. I think a lot of people forget he was a blocking TE that caught a few passes here and there in college. The passing game was never his forte. It was always something he was going to need to work on and develop. Too bad work on and develop can be said of pretty much every pick under the Rhule era. 

Tommy Tremble is a fullback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...