Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich doesn’t think there is any chance Burns plays Thursday


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Wait we don't need Burns no big deal right huddle fam?

I mean, it might not be the best matchup to highlight your point.  I mean this would be the  type matchup our D should be able to handle not having him if you had to pick a game. 

Bears are a top 5 rushing O

We are one of the top 5 worst defenses against the run.  

gameplan on a short week for Chicago should be simple.  Run, run, run. 


 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, it might not be the best matchup to highlight your point.  I mean this would be the  type matchup our D should be able to handle not having him if you had to pick a game. 

Bears are a top 5 rushing O

We are one of the top 5 worst defenses against the run.  

gameplan on a short week for Chicago should be simple.  Run, run, run. 


 

Foreman will get 150

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're 1-7. It doesn't matter. The only thing we're playing for right now is trying to avoid the shame of sending the #1 overall pick to Chicago after trading a haul to get the #1 overall pick.

I don't get this. Who cares if Chicago ends up with the #1 pick? We're not going to get it regardless.

Why does it matter if it's #1 or #5? We suck either way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I don't get this. Who cares if Chicago ends up with the #1 pick? We're not going to get it regardless.

Why does it matter if it's #1 or #5? We suck either way.

You don't think it would be ultra embarrassing to send a haul to Chicago for the #1 overall pick to then turn around and have part of that haul be a #1 overall pick in return?

Hell, we still talk about sending the pick that would turn into #33 overall to NE Armanti Edwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't think it would be ultra embarrassing to send a haul to Chicago for the #1 overall pick to then turn around and have part of that haul be a #1 overall pick in return?

Hell, we still talk about sending the pick that would turn into #33 overall to NE Armanti Edwards.

It would be embarrassing for people who hang out on message boards and Panthers Twitter. Otherwise, what difference does it actually make in terms of the future of the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...