Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official "I heard there was a game today" thread (game day thread...whoopie)


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, panfanman said:

Does anyone have even a thread of optimism for our team going into this game now that Frank Lee Predictable is gone?

The offense will look exactly the same. Even if they wanted to change it up there hasn’t been enough time to install. These players were still struggling to grasp reichs vanilla offense 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

You're kidding, thst could be a gargantuan difference in the game. I believe we didn't have Horn when we lost to them late last year.

We gonna get stomped...after the first half of a gallant try...everyone will give it up...and we'll just fade away into we don't give a sht......the camera will pan to hog jawls dipper with him shaking his head.... wondering why its so crappy ....its cause of YOU...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well think about how quickly our offense changed under Wilks.

Sure but wilks just went power run game. Which was already in the playbook just not being used. They can try to slam sanders up the gut all game but I don’t think it’ll be as effective as last year. The passing game just is what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RJK said:

Sure but wilks just went power run game. Which was already in the playbook just not being used. They can try to slam sanders up the gut all game but I don’t think it’ll be as effective as last year. The passing game just is what it is. 

I think we do see some offensive changes.

We will see. First game I have cared about in a while. Just to see what the response is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Johnstonny said:

We gonna get stomped...after the first half of a gallant try...everyone will give it up...and we'll just fade away into we don't give a sht......the camera will pan to hog jawls dipper with him shaking his head.... wondering why its so crappy ....its cause of YOU...

Tampa isnt good.  Baker will throw a pick 6 meaning we lose 17-13 or something like that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...