Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Admit Failure


BY9Franchise
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

At this point I think they trade it. Are folks not concerned about Male and Williams also being guys who hold onto the ball too long? 

The concern is real for especially Williams. Can he function within the pocket in the NFL? I feel we’ve seen more of Maye in the pocket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Martin said:

The concern is real for especially Williams. Can he function within the pocket in the NFL? I feel we’ve seen more of Maye in the pocket.

For sure. I think the Bears look to find a team that wants a QB and makes a trade back and adds to the WR room, Oline or dline with the pick. Snags a second with theirs and if they are bad again next year they look to replace the QB. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the path forward is actually really simple. You draft oline/WR in round 2, you bring in a FA WR, and you let Bryce start next year. If he's improved, great, if hes like he his this year, you will have a top 5 pick and you go QB again.

Gone are the days of giving QBs 3-4 years, thats just not the reality. How many recently turn out good if they arent solid players in year 2? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

No point looking at how massive the dead cap would be and us not having a 1st in 2024.

At this point you may as well keep starting him and get yourself a top 5 pick in 2025. 2024 is basically a lost year If he doesn't make some magical leap in performance 

If I were going to watch games in 2025 I’d agree. You have to get that top pick back and he is the man to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Trade him NOW. Just get whatever you can get. A 4th rounder, a 5th rounder. It doesn't matter anymore. He's cut after next season.

We’re past the trade deadline and no team would give us a 4th or 5th rounder for him. TMJ has more trade value than Bryce and no one wanted TMJ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BY9Franchise said:

That Clown tepper just needs to admit he fugged up royally and admit he f*aged up taking Bryce Young cut him immediately and move on!

 

#CUTBRYCEYOUNG #CUTBRYCEYOUNG #CUTBRYCEYOUNG #CUTBRYCEYOUNG

Dipper doesn't understand in those terms...you have to put a financial spin on it....like you bought $100 stock its now worth $50...get rid of it before it hits $20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...