Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we seriously consider Evero for head coach?


PleaseCutStewart
 Share

Recommended Posts

if i had tepper's ear, i'd point out building a team around the running game and defense would take advantage of market inefficiencies since everyone in the league is obsessed with offense. This would give them an advantage on acquiring defensive players and running backs, and would allow them to become competitive more quickly than if they were trying to build an offensive based team from scratch...again.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

if i had tepper's ear, i'd point out building a team around the running game and defense would take advantage of market inefficiencies since everyone in the league is obsessed with offense. This would give them an advantage on acquiring defensive players and running backs, and would allow them to become competitive more quickly than if they were trying to build an offensive based team from scratch...again.

He already knows all these things. David Tepper is a time traveling genius, remember? He’s 5 million steps ahead. Forget 4D chess, playing rounds of Gukungo with Cyberplex robots from the year 5381. The Panthers being bad is part of a much larger plan to save the world from the incoming invasion of hyper intelligent machines from the way distant future where bones become money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the thought, but man, we need him doing what he is doing.  Out of curiosity, I would like to know how many times an internal promotion leads to success--or is it better to move on to a different organization.  I was promoted once from a peon to a managerial dweeb, and it was difficult to get people to see me in my new role.  Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I had the thought, but man, we need him doing what he is doing.  Out of curiosity, I would like to know how many times an internal promotion leads to success--or is it better to move on to a different organization.  I was promoted once from a peon to a managerial dweeb, and it was difficult to get people to see me in my new role.  Just a thought.

Depends.  If he was a positional coach or lower, then yeah, but OCs/DCs are just a step below, many times holding the title of assistant HC.  I don't think the team would resist that. 

However, I wouldn't want him out of his role as DC.  Either he holds duel roles or he has to hire someone who thinks just as he does as the new DC.  Either one of those scenarios is a stretch.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, csx said:

If we are lucky. 

And if so then no stupid conditions about who his staff is. 

 

 

Evero was actually allowed to hire his own guys on defense.     I think all of the coaches had worked together including Capers.
 

It wasn't the hodge podge that the offensive staff was.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

Y'all realize that our defense isn't very good either, right?

It has been the least stinky turd in the pile, but that doesn't make great.

Let's just move on from everything associated with this season.

With the injuries this year he has had to make do with whatever warm bodies he had. No one could have done better, and the players haven’t quit on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...