Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the wide receivers magically get good?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RumHam said:

Or were they never the problem to begin? They werent. Its been the play calling and Bryce's decision making. Kudos to the best offensive game all year and the only game worth watching. Then the defense decided to not show up. We got hosed. We should keep this staff for one more year.

Nah this ain’t it. We never used pre snap motion with Reich. As of now, Chark is the only dude who had the speed to get separation under the old scheme and for whatever reason he was not. T Brown’s offense is light years better, the pre snap motion today and scheming open guys was so satisfying. The WRs def were a problem, it just wasn’t their fault. They were being asked to do something they couldn’t (outside of Chark) 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, frankw said:

Fair or not at the end of the day the offense goes as the QB goes. Bryce was dialed in and that translated to rest of the offense.

As bad as people are saying GB's defense is. The Bucs are somehow worse. No reason we can't replicate this performance next week. Against Baker Mayfield too? Cmon...

Speaking of Baker just had a perfect passer ratings against the Packers last week. 381 yards and 4 td's. Bryce had a good game but he's gonna have to do it again against Tampa. Also since we've already played them once it'll be easier to get an idea of what changes have or haven't benefited the offense since the first game. On another note Tabor seems like he's possibly the best in game manager we've had in recent memory though lol. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Speaking of Baker just had a perfect passer ratings against the Packers last week. 381 yards and 4 td's. Bryce had a good game but he's gonna have to do it again against Tampa. Also since we've already played them once it'll be easier to get an idea of what changes have or haven't benefited the offense since the first game. On another note Tabor seems like he's possibly the best in game manager we've had in recent memory though lol. 

Tabor was fired up and got in the refs ear a few times that game. Haven't seen that from a Panthers HC in a long long time.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frankw said:

Fair or not at the end of the day the offense goes as the QB goes. Bryce was dialed in and that translated to rest of the offense.

As bad as people are saying GB's defense is. The Bucs are somehow worse. No reason we can't replicate this performance next week. Against Baker Mayfield too? Cmon...

Oh youre dreaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Bryce was making some tight window throws and the packers D is garbage 

Gave up 500 yds last week to baker and made a giants backup qb look like tom brady but hey dont mention how bad the defenses are... you can only do that with andy dalton and other qbs. 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Gave up 500 yds last week to baker and made a giants backup qb look like tom brady but hey dont mention how bad the defenses are... you can only do that with andy dalton and other qbs. 

Indy was a bad defense so was Tennessee and Chicago wasn’t great either and BY and this offense didn’t look like this.. So miss me with that Green Bay being a bad defense BS!! All year we haven’t made a bad defense look bad..

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...