Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently Harbaugh Still wants the job here. But Tepper doesn’t want him


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

People don’t realize how BAD the chargers are in the hole with the cap and stuff lol 

Spanos won’t spend for your staff either.

I mean they have major work to do in that department honestly.  Cutting ties with Mack and Kendricks gets them down to about 4M over someone pointed out to me earlier.  I haven't been able to do the math myself so take it with a grain of salt.  After that you have some tough decisions to make to be able to ATLEAST sign your draft class.  Yeah its gonna take some big boy pants to pull it off. More than likely hold off on big moves, maybe some trade outs and compete with what's in the building for a year.  I would trust it to a vet HC/GM pairing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Tepper doesn't want him because Harbaugh wants to do poo his own way, for better or worse (in this case I trust Harbaugh's football instincts over Tepper's 1000000%)

Tepper wants someone to draw his napkin plays to and control. fug this bitch ass

If whomever steps into the role and wins his own way you don't have to worry about the owner, he can go off and play billionaire stock trader in his office.

Hire another dud and he has to come out of his basement and try and "fix" things.

So much hangs in the balance and we gotta take the first step and clean house in the FO on monday or shortly after.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love Harbaugh here. Need someone with a spine. And I think he would get us back to Panther football. I try to convince myself that he really does have interest in coming here. Maybe the reason this job would appeal to him more than the Raiders or Chargers is that we are NFC and would give him the opportunity to play in Super Bowl against his brother again. Yes I know we are not ready for Super Bowl obviously but if that is important to him, that potential eliminates half the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never wanted Harbaugh here but now not really in a place to be picky.

Getting back to physical football would be fun.  Not keeping Wilks is up there as one of the dumbest things the team has done. It would have avoided this enormous black eye.

Edited by csx
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s all about Tepper. If he isn’t getting credit for the winning he doesn’t see the point in winning. He doesn’t truly care about this team, he just bought it. He cares about himself and notoriety, remember the QB search on his private jet? Don’t give him a dime when he comes begging for it. 

Edited by Selltheteamtepper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...