Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is falling for the Peacock Wildcard bullshitt


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

Wow, the second I switched over to watch, a popup asked "Do you mind if Peacock shares your info with the NFL?" I told them they couldn't.

That's the neat part. They're still gonna. It's essentially a notice that they do. Your response just tells them how pissed average Americans are about it lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Peacock playoff game averaged 23 million viewers (including the Miami and KC local broadcasts)

Its being referred to as the most-streamed live event ever in the US

for comparison, the most watched TNF Prime game averaged 15.26m (last novembers SEAvDAL game)

the Texans-Browns game averaged 29m viewers 

the Peacock game had a 6% larger audience than the same time slot playoff game last year, so NBC and the NFL will likely view this as a success.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

The Peacock playoff game averaged 23 million viewers (including the Miami and KC local broadcasts)

Its being referred to as the most-streamed live event ever in the US

for comparison, the most watched TNF Prime game averaged 15.26m (last novembers SEAvDAL game)

the Texans-Browns game averaged 29m viewers 

the Peacock game had a 6% larger audience than the same time slot playoff game last year, so NBC and the NFL will likely view this as a success.

 

I'm sure they will see it as a "success" (because they want to see it as such), but comparing a playoff game to a TNF regular season game isn't necessarily the best comparison. The fact that it had 6 million less than the Texans-Browns should tell them something. That's quite a difference.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2024 at 5:45 PM, falconlynx said:

Imagine if they come up with a subscription service that combines everything we like to watch, including live sports, into one monthly payment for a reasonable price. So that we wouldn’t have to log into all these different streaming services and get nickel and dimed.

Oh wait, that’s what we had 5 years ago with cable (and it was at least reasonably priced in areas with competition).

You just knew this was the end result when all this streaming crap started. And just wait, the greed will continue to make it worse. 
 

Only way to get this to reverse is for us all to stop paying these prices for these largely worthless services. 


 

 

Cable was terrible. I pay way less for the services than I ever did for cable. That model is dead forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just the start.

A lot of dumb people out there who paid to see the game. They said it did better then the same time slot last year... Omg

Get ready for having to pay to see playoff games, becoming more common because as holes don't see that once they see you are willing to pay they will keep doing it.

The people missed there chance to stop this bs...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/15/2024 at 12:05 AM, TheBigKat said:

There will be more of this apparently

IMG_5661.jpeg

Peacock streams a ton of sporting events.  NFL was just never touched.  Soccer was moved to Peacock three years ago and that platform froze and crashed every week.  Folks better be glad it’s not 3 year ago quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That’s not a bad idea at all. I was really liking the whole cali-style carne asada. We might do that next week instead of enchiladas for the rams. Was planning on: Saints-Gumbo Tampa-Cuban Sandwiches Seattle- Salmon Stew Tampa- Seafood Boil 
    • I agree, honestly you can not trade a player that has Balls talent. Just sitting in street clothes FOR years, it doesn't matter if you are averaging 50points on 88% with 18 rebs, 15 asst, 4 stls if you never can play. These are the worst type of players, teasers. Its HIS JOB to get his body in NBA shape and he has proven that he can not. Thus you break the rule about trading top shelf talent. Hell NBA need to have NFL contracts where the full sum isn't guaranteed, you bet your ass if his money was tied to his playing on the court he'd somehow figure out how to stay healthy.   Plus Im a old head, I member when Seth Curry in his 17(Jesus..) year career had ankle problems and guess what, he solved the issues and got all the money, championships, and fame. Ball doesn't have the same drive to figure out his body, he'd rather drive his car on kids feet while rushing home to drive his go-cart on the roof of his condo after missing his 42nd game of the season.....
×
×
  • Create New...