Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Dan Morgan hire cause you to financially invest in the team (renew tickets)?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

For me it’s a RESOUNDING NO

no merch

no PSL renewal

nothing

 

you don’t hire an extensive search firm to hire the guy who was part of drafting Bryce Young. This just tells me that the search firm and all that was window dressing, Tepper has not changed one bit

 

 how can we as fans respond?

 

skip the March on Mint nonsense

 

 just don’t spend money on the team, no merchandise, no tickets. Just watch the circus from home or watch red zone 

With all due respect, the GM hire was never going to drive ticket sales. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only “move” that would make people invest is bringing 2015 Cam back to Carolina in a Time Machine.

This team knows the only way it can officially bring people back into is winning. There is nothing flashy that can be done. Preferably I’d rather they keep that mindset the time being.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HPPantherzfan said:

What if the extensive search firm told him Dan was the right man for the job?

Then all that firm did was take Tepper's money. There's no way anyone with a shred of common sense could look at the moves, roster, and record the Panthers have had since Morgan joined the FO and say yeah, he's the best guy, when he helped do all that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Then all that firm did was take Tepper's money. There's no way anyone with a shred of common sense could look at the moves, roster, and record the Panthers have had since Morgan joined the FO and say yeah, he's the best guy, when he helped do all that.

He was probably the only real candidate. I doubt anyone else wanted to work with Tepper after talking to him. Made Dan the top candidate by default. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll renew my PSL's, but only because I buy them through my business and use them as such.  Also, if we host the Cowboys, I can recoup 1/2 of the entire season's cost right there.  Other than that, no, I will not spend a dime on this team.  I'll begrudgingly spend $$ to go see CLT FC play, but only if my son wants to go.  Luckily, he likes the Independence games just as much, so that's my preferred choice.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...