Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe Tepper learned something...


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

He’s following the 49ers blueprint fingers crossed for the same results 

Crazy to think how similar the scenarios are as far as initial QB investment. Niners were going all in on Trey Lance and are now at Brock Purdy pretty much through ill fated luck on Lance’s part. 
 

It’ll be interesting to see how things go as far as Bryce’s development and if he can stay healthy. Lance shows that all it can take is one injury and a backup coming in kicking you to the curb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the HC hire is all Morgan.

If so, we need this staff to work out. If it does, Tepper will have learned the correct lesson.

If it doesn’t, he’s going to go back to what he was doing.….if he has actually gone more hands off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem hasn't been Tepper stubbornly refusing to learn from his mistakes. Tepper's time has been a string of mistakes followed by a 180 shift that still fails. For instance, he hires a college coach with almost no NFL experience with a staff with almost no NFL experience, and then proceeds to hire Frank Reich, a highly experienced coach who assembled an experienced legitimate NFL staff. He was criticized for holding onto Rhule too long, so then he fires Reich midway through his 1st season. He also went  from a couple retread veteran QBs to going all-in for a rookie. 

I think Tepper has shown he's willing to adapt. Just seemingly every move has stunk. I mean, if we take this example and let's say Canales fires Evero and replaces him with an absolute dud of a coordinator, I'm not going to applaud Tepper for being hands off. Bottom line, we need results, no matter how we get them.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jmac said:

It appears he is giving Canales the reigns to hire the coaching staff he wants. Maybe the first step in getting out of the way and letting the HC decide the hires. If he continues this with Morgan also, things maybe looking up.

Fingers crossed 

Does Capers and Caldwell still have direct access to text dipper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Na, its like flipping a coin and it lands heads 3 times in a row and you say tails, then you say tails and it lands on heads. Tepper is going to give the reigns to the wrong person then take it away from the right person. He can never get it right. He gave the reigns to Rhule and failed then took the reigns from Frank and got his QB and failed. Now he is giving the reigns to someone who has never been a head coach again. You cant make this stuff up

Edited by ncsfinest21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the issues I had with Fitterer was that he seemed to encourage Tepper to get involved in some decisions that should’ve been made by just Scott and the front office/coaches.

There’s not a ton of hard evidence of course, but from what we do have (The draft vids the team produced), it almost looked like Tepper was playing the role of Assistant GM at times. Maybe Fitterer was just too nice and wanted to keep Dave happy, but some of that stuff was alarming. 

Hopefully Morgan can strike a proper balance between keeping Tepper informed of what’s happening and remaining firmly in control of team decisions. 
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule had roster control and a 7 year deal.  Frank got the job in many respects because he sold Tepper on his ability to build a super coaching staff (with Teps money).

Now, Tepper hires Morgan.  Morgan hires Canales.  The first name for OC interviews is Bucs WR coach Idzik, whom worked with him in Tampa Bay and Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It should be a facto, because while he needs to perform to keep his job, you still have to build with an eye to the future. Where we will be drafting, there is a more than good chance of there being a player there at a position of more need, such as OT, LB, TE, S, or CB. With all those holes, I just don’t like the idea of taking a player who will ensure one of him, T-Mac, or Coker won’t be here 4 years from now, and we all know it won’t be T-Mac who gets jettisoned. So either believe in Coker or don’t, keep him and draft another position or draft a WR and trade him, don’t straddle the middle and hamstring us by leaving more holes while leaving us a huge problem a couple years from now.
    • Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
×
×
  • Create New...