Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are we low-key tanking? Donnelly thinks we're half-tanking.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

we are in luck, Morgan thought the 2023 roster was upgraded at all but one position from 2022.  He knows whats up

That is my fear. If they still think thay can compete with just a few tweeks nothing will change. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That is my fear. If they still think thay can compete with just a few tweeks nothing will change. 

Early yet, but with the early rumblings of what they wanna target this offseason there's no way they think a couple tweaks is enough.  I'll happily eat crow if I'm wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

The Replacements. I wouldn't mind if they just purged the lot of them save for a handful and pull from other teams practice squads to make a new roster for this season. It's time they do to the roster what they have been doing with the coaching staff. 


It’s not a bad idea. Find some highly motivated players for cheap.

Stack picks and cap space.

End up with a few diamonds in the rough when it’s over.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

That is my fear. If they still think thay can compete with just a few tweeks nothing will change. 

We’ll know as soon as FA kicks off. If we stand pat and let the dust settle a while, that’s good. If we jump in early, we’ll know there will be another regime change in 2-3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Panthero said:

Agreed. Do just enough with Bryce to trade his midget ass and move on. 

That milk is so spilt. His contract is fully guaranteed. 

What the heck would it mean if you did trade a guy in that scenario?

I understand that if you cut him, simple. You are on the hook for all of it. 

Is there any relief to be found at all for a team in a trade situation? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, strato said:

That milk is so spilt. His contract is fully guaranteed. 

What the heck would it mean if you did trade a guy in that scenario?

I understand that if you cut him, simple. You are on the hook for all of it. 

Is there any relief to be found at all for a team in a trade situation? 

 

Just let me dream, family. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...