Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Panthero said:

i take the Gettleman quote (its paraphrased of course) as the point being if you have a true difference maker at one spot, it overcomes three guys who are say shaq thompson types. great is so hard to find its carries premium value. a top five/ten guy at a position changes the whole team. 

Problem is, Burns is closer to a dime than a quarter, IMO. He’s maybe like a 15 cent piece who wants to be paid like a quarter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever we get for burns won't be near what we should have if we had done it at the right time last year.

Blame for missing out on anything close to that value falls squarely on Fitts shoulders.

We'll get what we can and it will be the right price. The right price is always what someone is willing to pay.

We'd like more. We may be pissed with less. We'll get what we get and we'll have to accept it.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

lol Giants fans are happy as hell on reddit.

 

At least Burns has a fanbase who embraces his talent.

 

Now we stuck with no pass rushers on the roster. Dan Morgan should be fired on the spot. Evero has to be fuming 2 of his top 3 defensive players are now gone smh.

 

 

No pass rushers isn't much different than having Burns. He was not a game changer.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

lol Giants fans are happy as hell on reddit.

 

At least Burns has a fanbase who embraces his talent.

 

Now we stuck with no pass rushers on the roster. Dan Morgan should be fired on the spot. Evero has to be fuming 2 of his top 3 defensive players are now gone smh.

 

 

After Burns admitted to mailing it in last year and playing not to get injured, do you really think he’s going to do much different on the franchise tag? We can find a one dimensional 7 sack pass rusher for much cheaper.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...