Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So.... do we win a game next year?


Recommended Posts

5 wins.  But, this will be 5 wins that shows tremendous growth.  We are paying for terrible drafting over a 3 year span.  I don't like the subtractions on defense but......

  • Von Bell missed 3 games
  • YTG missed 4 games
  • Chinn missed 5 games
  • Burns missed 1 game, checked out for many more
  • Shaq missed 16 games
  • Horn missed 12 games
  • Woods missed 4 games
  • Haynes Jr. Basically missed the season

Evero could truly make his case for a HC if we can get to 6-7 wins.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2024 at 6:16 PM, BeenPounding said:

5 wins.  But, this will be 5 wins that shows tremendous growth.  We are paying for terrible drafting over a 3 year span.  I don't like the subtractions on defense but......

  • Von Bell missed 3 games
  • YTG missed 4 games
  • Chinn missed 5 games
  • Burns missed 1 game, checked out for many more
  • Shaq missed 16 games
  • Horn missed 12 games
  • Woods missed 4 games
  • Haynes Jr. Basically missed the season

Evero could truly make his case for a HC if we can get to 6-7 wins. I would also like to recommend you a website where you will have the opportunity to play a lot of online games and make some money!

 

Those absences have certainly put a burden on the team's defense, which, as you pointed out, is already suffering from deductions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2024 at 8:53 AM, d-dave said:

 

We were historically bad in many ways.  How often does that happen multiple seasons in a row?  

How often does a historically bad team start the same QB for multiple seasons?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2024 at 1:50 AM, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah Canales wants to be run first, yet we gutted our defense so we're gonna have to pass. A little confused about the vision

The best defense is an offense that can milk the clock. Reduce opponent possessions and be efficient with your drives on offense. 
 

it’s old school but it’s so crazy it just might work. Personally, I love it. It’s what I called for all last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...