Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just curious, what would it take for you to trade #33 pick during draft?


CPF4LIFE
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’d have to see who we would be passing on to trade out. A future 1 would still have to include something decent this season, because unless it is a real bad team, the pick won’t be that far from 33. Doing it for a 2025 #25 for example, not that good for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

two dimes don't equal a quarter

It all depends on whether or not you hit the picks. Having 10 picks in the second doesn't mean anything if you draft a bunch of Eric Sheltons. I understand the success rates of higher picks, but if we're after a center and there's 3 we really like, trading down 10 spots and picking up an extra 3rd to grab a LB, RB or WR isn't necessarily a bad move, as long as you don't just draft based on a RAS score. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I have been doing a lock of mocks and every time of course there is a scenario for a trade down with a team. In my opinion i wouldnt want to go lower than #40 and also would be looking for at least another 3rd rounder in this draft and a pick next year no lower than 3rd round. Thats the starter, what say you?

Future 1rsr and 3rd this year

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's at least 3-5 heavy reaches in the first that cause guys to be available you wouldn't think would be there.  I prefer we stand pat and select the best.  Don't get cute.  33 is a great value pick that you shouldn't move down from. 

If anything, you trade a pointless 5th or something to move up a few picks into R1 at like 29/30.    

39 is a maybe if the return is in 40s, but I don't think you go much further down.  If you're picking up an extra 3rd/4th, it's a quality/valuable return, and you'll likely get a guy in the same draft block available at 39.  

Let's just select the best guy available.  If there happens to be a team desperate enough for a guy, sure, maybe take advantage of that, but don't deploy this as a strategy.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

There's at least 3-5 heavy reaches in the first that cause guys to be available you wouldn't think would be there.  I prefer we stand pat and select the best.  Don't get cute.  33 is a great value pick that you shouldn't move down from. 

If anything, you trade a pointless 5th or something to move up a few picks into R1 at like 29/30.    

39 is a maybe if the return is in 40s, but I don't think you go much further down.  If you're picking up an extra 3rd/4th, it's a quality/valuable return, and you'll likely get a guy in the same draft block available at 39.  

Let's just select the best guy available.  If there happens to be a team desperate enough for a guy, sure, maybe take advantage of that, but don't deploy this as a strategy.  

Definitely not something I'd do as a strategy, but depending on the offer, it could just be too good to pass up. And if it is, well.... 

 

4b94d3d2-b638-4a7f-9709-cb9899e379ea_text.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Past 40 made it difficult prior to us having #39. 

I think we could go down to 45-50, depending on the haul. 

i would rather go with fewer earlier picks than a ton of late round guys. 

if i can get the picks to be no later than 4th round i'm ok, but the first pick i get would have to be no more than 10 picks out from the original pick. 5-8 is the sweet spot, i think.

Half Baked Boo GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on who is there. If the Edge from Mizzou is there or Mitchell from Texas or Powers Johnson falls you take em.  But I agree with most after 40 it gets hard. If someone is trying to move up to grab Penix or Nix maybe we can squeeze some juice out of it and drop down some. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

Depends on who is there. If the Edge from Mizzou is there or Mitchell from Texas or Powers Johnson falls you take em.  But I agree with most after 40 it gets hard. If someone is trying to move up to grab Penix or Nix maybe we can squeeze some juice out of it and drop down some. 

Yeah im not passing on Robinson or JPJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...