Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields traded for bag of chips, why couldn’t we get Gerber competition?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, strato said:

Filed under ‘what goes around comes around’. By the same token if Bryce were any good they'd have used the pick themselves. 

They wanted to give him a fair shot which is good, but he just did not improve over 3 years. They took the trade because it was a king's ransom that would set them up for the future whether Fields was good or not.

Like if we absolutely suck next year but BY gets hurt for an extended period of time so we can't properly evaluate him, don't be surprised if we do the same thing they did and trade away the #1 pick to some dumbass team willing to sacrifice a ton of capital for a franchise QB while we punt to 2026, give Bryce another shot, then use the draft capital to retool in 2026.

Not saying I want it to happen, it just prolongs our misery as fans, but I wouldn't be surprised.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Becasue fields sucks. If 32 NFL actual GMs see it, why can’t y’all couch warriors?

I wouldn't go as far as saying he sucks; there is potential there. But clearly he's more highly thought of by fans and the sports media than he is in actual league circles. Otherwise they could have gotten a LOT more in a trade.

My biggest question here is why the Eagles didn't trade for Fields instead of Kenny Pickett? If you're going to trade for a young former 1st round QB with - presumably - some untapped potential left, why not go with the guy who has always had the higher ceiling?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I wouldn't go as far as saying he sucks; there is potential there. But clearly he's more highly thought of by fans and the sports media than he is in actual league circles. Otherwise they could have gotten a LOT more in a trade.

My biggest question here is why the Eagles didn't trade for Fields instead of Kenny Pickett? If you're going to trade for a young former 1st round QB with - presumably - some untapped potential left, why not go with the guy who has always had the higher ceiling?

I have said it before, Fields is an ELECTRIC runner, like Lamar Jackson levels of good at running the ball.

He unfortunately is Jimmy Clausen levels of throwing the football. His athleticism makes up some for his shortcomings as a passer which provide highlight reel plays at least once a game, but the rest of the time he drops back to pass he looks lost.

It very well could be a horrible offensive fit, that does happen, some QBs are better equipped to run certain offenses over others. Fields would probably do better in a Greg Roman style offense where they really lean into the QB's mobility at the detriment to the passing game, but that offense only works for so long and Fields would need to progress much further as a passer in order to reclaim a starting position in the league.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him go to LAC next offseason, or up to BAL to backup Lamar.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean on one hand Fields potential is enormous and he never really had a stable coaching staff and we have a supposed qb fixer as a head coach.  It might have been worth a 6 to get him in and see whats up.

 

But you do that and you potentially crater whatever confidence bryce has left

 

for a 6th I would have done it

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

They wanted to give him a fair shot which is good, but he just did not improve over 3 years. They took the trade because it was a king's ransom that would set them up for the future whether Fields was good or not.

Like if we absolutely suck next year but BY gets hurt for an extended period of time so we can't properly evaluate him, don't be surprised if we do the same thing they did and trade away the #1 pick to some dumbass team willing to sacrifice a ton of capital for a franchise QB while we punt to 2026, give Bryce another shot, then use the draft capital to retool in 2026.

Not saying I want it to happen, it just prolongs our misery as fans, but I wouldn't be surprised.

Please don’t say things like that I need my safe space.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, rayzor said:

Do we want to trade any more picks to the bears for what most believe is a bad QB?

Seriously, think about this. Just how low do you want to go? Think of the optics on the Burns fiasco.

Then multiply that by 10,890.

We sell the farm so we can trade for BY then give them a other pick for the QB they wanted nothing to do with.

Yowzers

It makes zero sense… so of course the huddle is up in arms about why we didn’t trade for him. 
 

this year is all about finding out if Bryce is it or not, which is exactly what the Bears did this year getting weapons for Fields to see if he could be the guy. If Bryce isn’t it, we’re drafting a qb next year. If he is, we don’t need Fields here as a backup that costs us a draft pick. Either way going after Fields who is proven not to be starting caliber qb makes zero sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean on one hand Fields potential is enormous and he never really had a stable coaching staff and we have a supposed qb fixer as a head coach.  It might have been worth a 6 to get him in and see whats up.

 

But you do that and you potentially crater whatever confidence bryce has left

 

for a 6th I would have done it

Who cares about Bryces confidence? Dog eat dog. We never worried about Cams "Confidence" The best qb should play no matter how stupid the teams owner is

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fields has never averaged more than 200 passing yards a year....even with weapons and a good oline .  Everyone that thinks fields is awesome just learned how awesome every coach in the nfl considers him...with all that said he still would possibly be an upgrade to b young.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To me, this seems like they feel they aren't going to be competitive. I can't help but go back to Bryce. Good guy, but he doesn't inspire people to give it their all. He isn't a "leader" that people look to. There is no Smith, Delhomme, Kuechly, Cam, etc. coming in that door.  It has to be Bryce, but biologically speaking, how often is the shortest man in the room going to command the kind of respect that will drive people? It just isn't. That isn't how we are wired. That isn't how any living animal on Earth today is wired.  I just follow the science guys. 
    • Vick's issue with Reid was that he couldn't take a hit, and he wouldn't go down. Otherwise he was pretty good much of the time.  Mahomes has a system that works. Mahomes doesn't become Mahomes elsewhere because not everyone can extract 125% of the ability of a specific player like Reid can. Kevin O'Connell is beginning to look like he has that ability as well but I'll need to see how he does with his Redshirt Freshman.  I also wonder how much of their playoff issue last year was related to the offense as a whole and not just Darnold. Fans don't really dive into the "why" things happen, they just see the what and complain about it. 
×
×
  • Create New...