Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales on fixing Bryce's footwork


Recommended Posts

Bryce had no shot last year. From the historically bad interior Oline to the terrible WR's (except Thielen) and an offensive coaching staff with so much division and terrible play concepts that no matter what happened he was going to fail. I'm still convinced that despite all the reporting that it was a joint decision to draft Bryce I still believe that Reich wanted Stroud or Derek Carr instead. 

If I'm Canales I tell Bryce to throw everything from last year in the trash expect for the Texans, Packers and the last drive from the rainy Falcons game. Take the times where the offense looked semi-functional and try to build on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

Bryce had no shot last year. From the historically bad interior Oline to the terrible WR's (except Thielen) and an offensive coaching staff with so much division and terrible play concepts that no matter what happened he was going to fail. I'm still convinced that despite all the reporting that it was a joint decision to draft Bryce I still believe that Reich wanted Stroud or Derek Carr instead. 

i think reich wanted carr. reich is an old dog (not "dawg") who just wasn't interested in learning any new tricks or teaching any. 

i agree with just about everything else. there was too much bad poo going on around the whole situation to properly evaluate and develop any rookie QB. and yes, a #1 overall pick or any rookie QB will have to have things worked on and thinking they shouldn't is just not an opinion based on reality. and thinking we saw enough last year from BY to think he's garbage is just as narrow minded, but whatever...

this year we will see what he can do and where he can or can't grow. last year was a throw away year except in giving Canales tape to see what they can work on.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Sure you can. Velocity, angle, air time, loft, accuracy. Every one of these can be measured without a receiver. Either he can get the ball there at an elite level or he can't. 

We're talking about defenses crowding the box last year though. Could be because they don't think Bryce can throw it, or they saw our origami offensive line, or they knew our bozo coaches weren't calling deep balls, or maybe the league isn't afraid of DJ Chark. We don't know how much each part played into it. It could be any or all of it.

I admit I checked out as the season went on so I could have just missed them, but I don't remember many plays falling apart because Bryce underthrew. We're mostly going off the fact that we avoided going deep but I have a hard time running with the narrative that they were working around Bryce's arm when everything that staff did was inept and nonsensical. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's all of the above. The OL sucked. The receivers sucked. The scheme sucked. The play calling sucked. And... yes, the QB sucked.

Their point is that a QB cannot succeed in that circumstance.   Not an argument that he's the answer either.  Just... lay off a bit and let's see how this season goes. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of y'all are really thinking that Stroud was the norm.  No, CJ Stroud's rookie year was the exception.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-texans-playoffs-ranking-c-j-strouds-2023-among-best-rookie-qb-seasons-since-2010/

From 2010-2021 there have been 23 QBs selected in the top three rounds of the NFL draft to start 10 or more games.  Why did I stop in 2021?  Well, 2022 and 2023 are still fresh and the returns are interesting.

2022 brought us Kenny Pickett, Desmond Ridder, Malik Willis, and Matt Corral in the top three rounds. 

We are most familiar with 2023, Bryce Young, CJ Stroud, Anthony Richardson, Will Levis, and Hendon Hooker.

That brings us to 28 rookie QBs since 2010 who started 10+ games as a rookie.    Sure, you have those top 8, but after that, it's a crap shoot.  Also, you can look and see that some of these guys peaked at rookies, some had sustained success, others were just meh.

Now let's go back to the Frank Reich era (so long ago).  They wanted to make sure Bryce could call the plays first before they worked on the feet and fundamentals.  That's why late in the season you had the "his footwork is terrible!" stuff come out.  The Reich way was the wrong way.  Would CJ Stroud as been as effective as he was in Carolina?  If you really think that, be careful buying things online...that's all I'll say.

Finally, some of y'all will die on a hill that Bryce Young is not an NFL QB for all of the reasons many of y'all continue to drum beat.  The stark reality is that this is kind of a make it or break it year for him.  If he continues to play poorly, then he'll be gone.  I think Bryce is smart enough to understand that his size outlier gives him less opportunity to show he can be the guy than someone like Sam Darnold, who continues to make good money by looking the part in practice.  If Bryce and the Panthers don't produce more offense (which puts butts in seats), then he will be gone and we'll be looking for a new QB again.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, electro's horse said:

like how he implies after a year of tape, they still have to figure out what routes and concepts bryce is comfortable with 

You’d rather him tell everyone which route concepts they’re going to emphasize?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

Their point is that a QB cannot succeed in that circumstance.   Not an argument that he's the answer either.  Just... lay off a bit and let's see how this season goes. 

But a QB can show the necessary traits to succeed despite being in a poo show. Bryce didn't. That's what concerns me. He proved to not be nearly as accurate as I thought he'd be and got hung up locking into his first read far too often while showing the footwork of River Dance in the pocket while the physical limitations that had me concerned proved to be considerably more limiting than I feared. It's a REAL uphill battle for him.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

But a QB can show the necessary traits to succeed despite being in a poo show. Bryce didn't. That's what concerns me. He proved to not be nearly as accurate as I thought he'd be and got hung up locking into his first read far too often while showing the footwork of River Dance in the pocket while the physical limitations that had me concerned proved to be considerably more limiting than I feared. It's a REAL uphill battle for him.

yep.  Special QBs show you the glimpses and moments even in bad spots.  

I think there is no escaping Bryce's physical size issue paired with his natural tendency/instincts.  It takes too much off the table.  Ceiling will forever be low because of it and he is in a world dominated by athletic/physical freaks. 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

But a QB can show the necessary traits to succeed despite being in a poo show. Bryce didn't. That's what concerns me. He proved to not be nearly as accurate as I thought he'd be and got hung up locking into his first read far too often while showing the footwork of River Dance in the pocket while the physical limitations that had me concerned proved to be considerably more limiting than I feared. It's a REAL uphill battle for him.

he threw off of his back feet when he wasn't throwing the ball into the dirt in front of him. Hopefully having better blocking will help, but dude rarely would step up in the pocket, step into his throws, and they were afraid to have him roll out probably due to protecting the investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

he threw off of his back feet when he wasn't throwing the ball into the dirt in front of him. Hopefully having better blocking will help, but dude rarely would step up in the pocket, step into his throws, and they were afraid to have him roll out probably due to protecting the investment.

All that talk about his throwing with anticipation went right out the window when he threw two ugly picks across the middle trying to do that in week one. He became a see it first then throw guy after that and that's a tough row to hoe when your arm is subpar. By the time you see it it's already gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Houston would have taken Young over Stroud. He was  consensus No. 1. Hindsight is 20/20.  Not sure why you are baffled.

 

 

 

Says who? If they wanted Young they could have traded up to get him.(Like I think Car was hoping they would do) Even before the draft Hou HC said " I don't think Car is taking the QB we want" so why trade up. They got the QB they wanted the OFF rookie of the year. Car tried to get cute to control the draft but was stuck at #1, even the owner said they was think Hou would get #1 and they would take Stroud at #2 so that came out his mouth.. No hindsight never wanted Young based on the tape before the draft. All was proved right with how bad a yr he had. Not saying he can't get better but all the major red flags from his COLLEGE tape showed up last year... 

Hate when ppl act like everyone loved Young till he looked like poo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
    • ➥✅ Official Website:Revive CBD Gummies Reviews ➥✅ Product Name: Revive CBD Gummies Reviews ➥✅ Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) ➥✅ Side Effects: No Major Side Effects ➥✅ Availability: In Stock #1 Product in the USA   CBD, short for cannabidiol, has garnered immense attention in recent years for its potential health benefits. Among the myriad of CBD products flooding the market, CBD gummies have emerged as a popular choice due to their convenience and ease of consumption. Revive CBD Gummies is one such product that claims to offer a host of health benefits. In this article, we delve into Revive CBD Gummiesreviews to uncover whether they live up to the hype.CBD, short for cannabidiol, has garnered immense attention in recent years for its potential health benefits. Among the myriad of CBD products flooding the market, CBD gummies have emerged as a popular choice due to their convenience and ease of consumption. Revive CBD Gummies is one such product that claims to offer a host of health benefits. In this article, we delve into Revive CBD Gummies reviews to uncover whether they live up to the hype. https://www.facebook.com/Get.ReviveCBDGummiesReviews/ https://sites.google.com/view/revive-cbd-gummy-reviews/home https://sites.google.com/view/revivecbdgummiesreviewswork/home https://revive-cbd-gummy-reviews.jimdosite.com/ https://revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-work.jimdosite.com/ https://anthonmkl.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/04/29/revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-health-benefits-analyzed-latest-customer-feedback-getnow-49 https://revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-work.webflow.io/ https://revivecbdgummyreviews.company.site/ https://medium.com/@anthonmkl/revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-beware-fraud-consumer-claims-and-results-sale-49-554005b62f52 https://medium.com/@anthonmkl/revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-my-experience-with-these-cbd-infused-candies-c650ae3e91eb https://revivecbdgummyreviews.blogspot.com/2024/04/revive-cbd-gummies-reviews.html https://www.eventbrite.com/e/revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-serious-side-effects-or-safe-ingredients-major-april-2024-update-tickets-893445267847?aff=oddtdtcreator https://www.eventbrite.com/e/revive-cbd-gummies-reviews-new-report-does-it-work-what-they-wont-tell-you-tickets-893445689107?aff=oddtdtcreator https://teeshopper.in/products/Revive-CBD-Gummies-Reviews
    • I mean, first of all, I'm not the one who initially said he was a life long fan, it was in that tweet in the OP. But more importantly, "life long fan" is a relative term, especially for a franchise like the Panthers.  I think anyone who was say, 10-12 or younger when the franchise started, and been a fan since the start, could claim to be a life long fan. I'm 38, been a fan of the team since year 1 even though I'm not even from the Carolinas, after almost 30 years of fandom and following them since the beginning, I have no issue saying I'm a life long Panthers fan. Very possible his dad is say around 40 years old and been a Panthers fan since the start.  And even if he's a little older, if you're a fan of a team for 30 out of your say 45ish years of life... that's "life long" in that instance.
×
×
  • Create New...