Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers bot


Paa Langfart
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

9 minutes ago, jtm said:

For someone that isn't on here every day can someone elaborate on the bot b/c I'm curious?

It's the bot that autoposts articles from the panthers official website. It was banned during the season because no one within the fanbase wanted to see them try and spin an article about how "good" things were even though they were really really bad.

1 hour ago, Adb6368 said:

What was the reconciliation process like? Were they begging to come back? Did we beg them to come back to try and sway the detractors? Was the initial ban an amicable split?

this is like when you freeze out a friend then months later allow them back in and act like nothing ever happened. 

so many questions 

The fanbase's toxicity has subsided significantly, the hopium is currently being huffed hard thanks to Dirty Dan and Handsome Dave, it's nice to learn more about the new players signed in free agency, and also the mods aren't as pissy as we were 6 months ago.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the off-season. Lots of folks have complained about the Huddle being too negative. So, we allow back the full throated all our hope propaganda machine of the bot.

And then folks who complain about negativity complain. Starting to see a common theme here... LOL

It's called the chapped ass syndrome 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the off-season. Lots of folks have complained about the Huddle being too negative. So, we allow back the full throated all our hope propaganda machine of the bot.

And then folks who complain about negativity complain. Starting to see a common theme here... LOL

What's wrong with being negative? Look at us. It's not negative. It's reality. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...