Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill's Diggs to Houston for 2025 2nd rounder

thunderraiden

By thunderraiden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

lol at old and underperformed 

107 catches, 1183 yards and 8 touchdowns 

Yeah we don’t need someone like that at all

Adam Theilen had 1014 and 4 TDs 

Deiontae Johnson had    717 and 5 TDs 

That's not too bad imo. So really we just need either Mingo to improve or a drafted WR to be good.  Or both ideally 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PappyMay Mentor

PappyMay

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

Adam Theilen had 1014 and 4 TDs 

Deiontae Johnson had    717 and 5 TDs 

That's not too bad imo. So really we just need either Mingo to improve or a drafted WR to be good.  Or both ideally 

This. If Marshall can be used in this new offense and get 3-400 yards too and 2-3 TDs we could be cooking.  I’m being an optimist until we start out 0-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

This. If Marshall can be used in this new offense and get 3-400 yards too and 2-3 TDs we could be cooking.  I’m being an optimist until we start out 0-2.

The same Marshall the Panthers told to go seek a trade and no one wanted?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

it's a 2025 2nd rounder so who cares. 

this is a great move and people saying otherwise are lying to themselves. 

Texans are going for it with the quarterback the Panthers passed on to draft a midget. 

Has nothing to do with the pick, but the mental stability player they got in return.

There's a reason the Bills made this move, teams in a legit SB window don't just trade away their best non QB for the heck of it.  He's the biggest diva WR in the league right now, not sure that's the best thing for the development of a young QB, especially when they already had a few really good WRs on the team as is.

I fully get that they're going for it while on Stroud's rookie deal, which is why I can't blame them for making the move, but I think it's very much a 50/50 coin flip as to if this one backfires on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PappyMay Mentor

PappyMay

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

The same Marshall the Panthers told to go seek a trade and no one wanted?

New coach and new scheme. I'm not saying he's going to be elite but average 2-3 catches a game for the whole year would double up what he did last. I think its possible unless we double dip at WR. Know we will take 1, but we will see if we grab 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted

The Texans just got better yall. Like or not. They're a strong team in all phases (O, D, ST) with a strong HC, DC, and a wonder kid at OC. Slowik must have seen a way that Stephon would help the team enough for his contract and attitude. He's obviously convinced he can make it work. And I'm more confident in him than I am in Stroud (who looks like he's ready to take the reigns from Lamar and Mahomes). I know it's a foreign concept to Panther fans, but the GM, HC, DC and OC work together to build rosters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...