Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill's Diggs to Houston for 2025 2nd rounder


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

lol at old and underperformed 

107 catches, 1183 yards and 8 touchdowns 

Yeah we don’t need someone like that at all

Adam Theilen had 1014 and 4 TDs 

Deiontae Johnson had    717 and 5 TDs 

That's not too bad imo. So really we just need either Mingo to improve or a drafted WR to be good.  Or both ideally 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

Adam Theilen had 1014 and 4 TDs 

Deiontae Johnson had    717 and 5 TDs 

That's not too bad imo. So really we just need either Mingo to improve or a drafted WR to be good.  Or both ideally 

This. If Marshall can be used in this new offense and get 3-400 yards too and 2-3 TDs we could be cooking.  I’m being an optimist until we start out 0-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

This. If Marshall can be used in this new offense and get 3-400 yards too and 2-3 TDs we could be cooking.  I’m being an optimist until we start out 0-2.

The same Marshall the Panthers told to go seek a trade and no one wanted?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

it's a 2025 2nd rounder so who cares. 

this is a great move and people saying otherwise are lying to themselves. 

Texans are going for it with the quarterback the Panthers passed on to draft a midget. 

Has nothing to do with the pick, but the mental stability player they got in return.

There's a reason the Bills made this move, teams in a legit SB window don't just trade away their best non QB for the heck of it.  He's the biggest diva WR in the league right now, not sure that's the best thing for the development of a young QB, especially when they already had a few really good WRs on the team as is.

I fully get that they're going for it while on Stroud's rookie deal, which is why I can't blame them for making the move, but I think it's very much a 50/50 coin flip as to if this one backfires on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

The same Marshall the Panthers told to go seek a trade and no one wanted?

New coach and new scheme. I'm not saying he's going to be elite but average 2-3 catches a game for the whole year would double up what he did last. I think its possible unless we double dip at WR. Know we will take 1, but we will see if we grab 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Texans just got better yall. Like or not. They're a strong team in all phases (O, D, ST) with a strong HC, DC, and a wonder kid at OC. Slowik must have seen a way that Stephon would help the team enough for his contract and attitude. He's obviously convinced he can make it work. And I'm more confident in him than I am in Stroud (who looks like he's ready to take the reigns from Lamar and Mahomes). I know it's a foreign concept to Panther fans, but the GM, HC, DC and OC work together to build rosters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...