Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person predicts a trade back


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

At our position, and with our positions of need, arguably there is not a lot of difference between the beginning of the second and end of the third.  Whether we trade back will depend upon who is available at the time, and what is the compensation being offered by another team. It's all about perceived and real value

last 33rd pick was essentially dealt for a 3rd rounder.  I just want them to draft BPA at 33.  Trading more times than not has you kicking yourself in hindsight IMO.  

we need instant offensive help if we are going to salvage this Bryce pick.  That should be the priority.  Seeing if Bryce can remain the dude. We should be able to get skill talent that can see the field in this draft on O.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's situation dependent. 

I'd prefer we stand pat at 33 if any of the following are available:

JPJ/Barton/Frazier, Chop, Arnold/DeJean/McKinstry, Mitchell/McConkey-- those are 9 specific players where the value add for me is too good to pass us.  

If anything, I would turn around after landing an impact starter, and trade 39 into the 40s on a package deal.  Meaning - 39 & 141 to, for example JAX for 48 and 96 and maybe a late 2025th (checks out chart wise)  

So, land another third, but if you like the second rounders, are still assured a guy in that range.

Scenario could look like:

33(2), 48(2), 65(3), 96(3), 101(4), 142(5), 240(6)..and an added pick in 2025

That 48 could be Ja'Tavion Sander, Edge Cooper, Kneeland, Polk, etc. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt any team gives the Panthers the true value of passing on a McConkey or AD Mitchell or Chop Robinson or JPJ. 

The draft is quality over quantity. Quantity doesn't mean jack if guys aren't contributing on games days. 

And if a team REALLY wanted a player enough to give up anything remotely valuable enough (to me that would be a future first/second and their current second and third), they would have drafted him with their 1st round pick. Not waited until the 2nd round. 

Too many WRs will be available, to a team devoid of WR talent, to start playing around with draft capital. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading down is usually not a good thing.  You could argue that we traded down to get Jon Beason back in the day.  That turned out alright, didn't it?  The player we traded away?  Revis Island.

Having just thought of one example and applying it to every possible situation as some are prone to do, I will consider this if the following conditions occur:

1.  Since the WR depth is deep, multiple WRs expected to be available at 33 will be available.

2. Any trade backs include a third rounder or higher this season or a first or second rounder in 2025 (I see this draft and laying the foundation, and if we can fill the gaps in the 2025 draft, it could be worth a drop.)

OR

3. Any trade back includes a quality player at a need position in addition to swapping picks this season.

It all depends on the board.  For example, would you surrender Ladd McConkey if you could get Ricky Pearsall and Payton Wilson in return?  

This is a DEEP draft with a lot of first round grades---the Panthers have many needs and other teams know that and will want to move up.  In my opinion, the picks 33-40 will include names that had been projected to go in round 1.  After 40, the talent is pretty level until around pick 70.  So if we could trade 33 for pick 42 and 70, for example, we would have 39, 42, 65, and 70.  WR, C, LB, CB.

However, any GM without a first rounder who enters a draft looking to fill 5 spots is a dreamer.  We should really focus on our top 2 immediate needs ( WR,  C or TE) and the rest are depth.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The fact that Mingo is already being considered a bust is such a disappointment. They draft a 2nd round WR last year, they're drafting one again, this team is such a f*cking nightmare to be a fan of. 

I'd say its too early, and it is.  But the dude was honestly one of the most awkward players I've ever watched.  His body movements and sense of direction were puzzling at times.  The only recent player I can think of that looked awkward like that was Chuba Hubbard as a rookie.  But, he made rookie Chuba look like a natural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...