Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants thought they would have to give up more in trade for Brian Burns


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Morgan was on board against the trade as well

I mean if we are perfectly honest neither are or were qualified to be a GM. 

Unless you ask Mr. Scot who literally believes teams were fighting over Fit for some reason.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, countryboi said:

We got good value for CMC at the time. that said, Burns is gone and we spent that money well, at least I think so

I highly disagree. He’s one of the best players in the league. We have spend a sh*t ton of money, and draft capital trying to replace his production, and haven’t even come close. We would be MUCH better with CMC still on our team. That trade looks horrible now and we should have never done it. Burns….i believe that’s another story though. He’s not impacting games like CMC

Edited by WarPanthers89
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Says who?

All I have seen is rumors and innuendo.  We don't know what was discussed behind closed doors. 

Says our beat reporter.

https://twitter.com/PanthersAnalyst/status/1767372169238225108

 

 

water under the bridge and all but its not a good look

There may be 3ish non qbs (maybe) that you wouldnt make that trade for but I doubt its even that high.

Morgan was second in command behind Scott Fitterer in 2022 when the Panthers rejected the Rams’ offer just days after trading All-Pro running back Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers. The lone dissenting voice was former salary cap and contracts executive Samir Suleiman, who believed the Panthers should take the picks for Burns, according to three sources familiar with the discussions.

 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Says our beat reporter.

https://twitter.com/PanthersAnalyst/status/1767372169238225108

 

 

water under the bridge and all but its not a good look

There may be 3ish non qbs (maybe) that you wouldnt make that trade for but I doubt its even that high.

Morgan was second in command behind Scott Fitterer in 2022 when the Panthers rejected the Rams’ offer just days after trading All-Pro running back Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers. The lone dissenting voice was former salary cap and contracts executive Samir Suleiman, who believed the Panthers should take the picks for Burns, according to three sources familiar with the discussions.

 

Thanks. 

Maybe, but it could just be that they agreed to agree in public but had private disagreements.  We will never know for certain.  But if its true, maybe we should have kept Suleiman.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just didn’t want them to pay him was my biggest thing.

The two firsts deal, I felt like Tepper wanted to keep him but that is just guessing. You are nuts to reject at least pursuing it. If they offered that initially it is only a starting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I highly disagree. He’s one of the best players in the league. We have spend a sh*t ton of money, and draft capital trying to replace his production, and haven’t even come close. We would be MUCH better with CMC still on our team. That trade looks horrible now and we should have never done it. Burns….i believe that’s another story though. He’s not impacting games like CMC

The CMC trade was awful.

CMC for '23 2nd*, '23 3rd, '23 4th, '24 5th

-2nd was part of Bryce Young trade, 3rd & 4th were traded to PIT to draft DJ Johnson, 5th** swapped with NYG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We traded the contract--got 2 players who will make a huge impact on our offense than a DE who gets a sack every other game.  I hate to lose him, but I think this will give our guys a chance to step up.

I look at differences.  What is the difference between Burns and Clowney?  Burns is an A player and Clowney is a B player.  What is the difference between our Guards and Center last season and our Guards and Center this season?  LG was a D-, RG was a D-, Center was a D.  We should get an A at RG, B at LG, and C at center. Bigger difference for same money--and our QB will evolve from an F to a C, for example.  I can also see our RBs improving from C- to B. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...