Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants thought they would have to give up more in trade for Brian Burns


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Morgan was on board against the trade as well

I mean if we are perfectly honest neither are or were qualified to be a GM. 

Unless you ask Mr. Scot who literally believes teams were fighting over Fit for some reason.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, countryboi said:

We got good value for CMC at the time. that said, Burns is gone and we spent that money well, at least I think so

I highly disagree. He’s one of the best players in the league. We have spend a sh*t ton of money, and draft capital trying to replace his production, and haven’t even come close. We would be MUCH better with CMC still on our team. That trade looks horrible now and we should have never done it. Burns….i believe that’s another story though. He’s not impacting games like CMC

Edited by WarPanthers89
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Says who?

All I have seen is rumors and innuendo.  We don't know what was discussed behind closed doors. 

Says our beat reporter.

https://twitter.com/PanthersAnalyst/status/1767372169238225108

 

 

water under the bridge and all but its not a good look

There may be 3ish non qbs (maybe) that you wouldnt make that trade for but I doubt its even that high.

Morgan was second in command behind Scott Fitterer in 2022 when the Panthers rejected the Rams’ offer just days after trading All-Pro running back Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers. The lone dissenting voice was former salary cap and contracts executive Samir Suleiman, who believed the Panthers should take the picks for Burns, according to three sources familiar with the discussions.

 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Says our beat reporter.

https://twitter.com/PanthersAnalyst/status/1767372169238225108

 

 

water under the bridge and all but its not a good look

There may be 3ish non qbs (maybe) that you wouldnt make that trade for but I doubt its even that high.

Morgan was second in command behind Scott Fitterer in 2022 when the Panthers rejected the Rams’ offer just days after trading All-Pro running back Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers. The lone dissenting voice was former salary cap and contracts executive Samir Suleiman, who believed the Panthers should take the picks for Burns, according to three sources familiar with the discussions.

 

Thanks. 

Maybe, but it could just be that they agreed to agree in public but had private disagreements.  We will never know for certain.  But if its true, maybe we should have kept Suleiman.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just didn’t want them to pay him was my biggest thing.

The two firsts deal, I felt like Tepper wanted to keep him but that is just guessing. You are nuts to reject at least pursuing it. If they offered that initially it is only a starting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I highly disagree. He’s one of the best players in the league. We have spend a sh*t ton of money, and draft capital trying to replace his production, and haven’t even come close. We would be MUCH better with CMC still on our team. That trade looks horrible now and we should have never done it. Burns….i believe that’s another story though. He’s not impacting games like CMC

The CMC trade was awful.

CMC for '23 2nd*, '23 3rd, '23 4th, '24 5th

-2nd was part of Bryce Young trade, 3rd & 4th were traded to PIT to draft DJ Johnson, 5th** swapped with NYG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We traded the contract--got 2 players who will make a huge impact on our offense than a DE who gets a sack every other game.  I hate to lose him, but I think this will give our guys a chance to step up.

I look at differences.  What is the difference between Burns and Clowney?  Burns is an A player and Clowney is a B player.  What is the difference between our Guards and Center last season and our Guards and Center this season?  LG was a D-, RG was a D-, Center was a D.  We should get an A at RG, B at LG, and C at center. Bigger difference for same money--and our QB will evolve from an F to a C, for example.  I can also see our RBs improving from C- to B. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...