Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prime Cam plugged into this roster what happens?


Ricky Prickles
 Share

Recommended Posts

Someone give me a scenario of what they think this team would look like if we could go back in time and last season we drafted rookie Cam Newton out of Auburn instead of Bryce. This team is not without talent on offense at all. Some of our receivers last week would have looked like world beaters. The Taints would have been so flustered when Cam passed and ran all over their asses they would have been backpedaling instead of of coming forward at us the whole game is my belief. Give me this exact team with Cam and all his fire and confidence and attitude and it would be infectious. We would see fire from many more guys and willing to bet that defense would have even looked better (maybe not great) being more rested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually had the Seahwaks game from 2015 pop up in my recommended on YouTube yesterday and went down a rabbit hole reliving the good ole days. 

Offensively, the roster now is better. 

Cam > Bryce

Stew > Chuba 

Ginn < Diontae 

Cotch < Thielen 

Philly < XL 

Olsen > Sanders 

OL = OL (Oher, Kalil only obvious upgrades but Moton >>>>>> Remmers) 

Jury is still out on Canales, it's been one game, but I have a hard time believing the offensive playcalling would ever be as stale and conservative as it was under Ron/Shula. 

All in all, with 2015 Cam on this Roster we're putting up points, and a lot of them. 

Defensively though, yikes... I don't known that a single person on this defense would start over that 2015 team except maybe Brown over Star, Woods over Harper and Horn over Peanut and those last 2 I'm not 100% on. 

All in all it probably looks a lot like Cams rookie season. 28+ points a game, setting the world on fire Offensively and breaking records but we can't stop a nose bleed on the other end and lose a bunch of close games 35-31. 

I'd still watch though and most importantly I'd have hope for the future. 

 

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’d be competitive; in on every game. 7-9 wins. Defense wouldn’t be able to stop a nose bleed. There’d probably be a game in there where Cam is off with accuracy, and with the defense not stopping anyone, it would be a blowout. So, yea, one blowout, but he’d get us to 7-9 wins. 
 

With Bryce, we’ll win 0-1 game this year, and that one potential win won’t be because of Bryce. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This. If we had a promising young QB everyone would be frustrated about the abysmal D but the overall hope for the future would be completely different. Again, just like Cam's rookie year.

If he were just simply dropped in.

If he had been on the team the investment in offense would not have to have been so over the top. We'd have better on defense. 

The loading up the offense just went over and above. Hell when I was posting the tally of offense vs defense drafting, it didn't hit me upside the head until I saw it on the field.

As far as the defense, they have had very little time as a unit, pieces in and out every day almost. They will get better with reps together but with Derrrick out, that's tough. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...