Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worse To Watch: Jimmy Clausen Era or Bryce Young Era?


PantherBoy95
 Share

Recommended Posts

Young era by far

Clausen year at the time felt temporary because it was the last year of Fox's contract, it was clear Jerry blew up that team to prove a petty point, and we all thought the Panthers would just get Andrew Luck. Yeah that of course didn't happen but we still got a great QB in the end.

Young era is just another chapter in the shitshow of the Tepper era. And deep down I think we all know the nightmare isn't going to end once Young is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, spydaman27 said:

At this point let’s keep Bryce going, get the number 1 pick. Get some stud player. Still keep young next year get number 1 pick again and draft Manning to change our future.

 

And the league needs to force Tepper to sell. 

I'm all about the second part. That's where my last drop of hope lies. 

The first one doesn't matter. This team is locked in on a top 5 pick anyways. Dalton won't play too much before falling apart. The rest of the team needs a chance to improve and that's not happening with Bryce. It's very hard to justify not sitting him if they get behind like the last 2 games. Hell just play Plumber. It's not going to effect the draft position much anyways but the games would get more watchable and the guys on the roster would get a chance to improve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...