Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marquis Haynes is back


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean averaging 4 sacks a year on roughly 30% of snaps, hard to complain about that if he can give us that again. Almost Burns equivalent sack numbers if you flip their snap counts the last few healthy years 

Burns is one of the most overrated panther players of all time

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean averaging 4 sacks a year on roughly 30% of snaps, hard to complain about that if he can give us that again. Almost Burns equivalent sack numbers if you flip their snap counts the last few healthy years 

Brian Burns has just one more sack than Haynes this season. LOL

  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should have open tryouts every Monday for any dude that wants to be a pass rusher. Put it out on social media for anyone that thinks they are bad enough, fast enough and mean enough to be the guy. There's got to be a couple of big guys out there that's dreamed if being an nfl player that would give it a go? Right? Buller? Buller?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...