Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young - Good and Bad, what say you?

CLG

By CLG,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gapanthersfan Mentor

Gapanthersfan

Posted
Posted

I will levy a compliment that I never thought I could ever, ever give the backpack kid. He looked like a football player today. Just typing that gave me chest pain. 

Run game was shut down, but he still produced against a really tough D. He dropped a few very pretty dimes, led a 4th quarter comeback to tie, and got the piss knocked out of him a few times. 

Well done, please keep it up. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

Weak armed qb carried by an elite RB and a defense that played its head off

seems pretty similar to me

🤷‍♂️ different Chiefs team too. And I wouldn’t say Bryce was carried by his defense today…they made some good plays in the 4th quarter but overall it was a poor showing. Like I said, Bryce made some mistakes but also made some good plays he hadn’t been before. Specifically those lasers threading the needle two or three times in the red zone. He’s not there yet, not close, but he’s trending upward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

We still had to settle for 4 FGs.  That's the main problem with Bryce is when the field gets compacted in the red zone, he struggles.  Yes, he can move the ball between the 20s for the most part, but inside the opponents 20, we have to rely on Eddie P way too often.

There's a lot at play there, including missing JT and Coker. But he definitely needs to get better in the red zone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stuart Smith Mentor

Stuart Smith

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, shaq said:

263 yards, zero turnovers, completed multiple tough 3rd and 4th down conversions and almost beat the best team in the league. Gtfo go be a little emo girl somewhere else

Without the dropped passes he would probably have 300 yards, maybe another touchdown. The balls he threw away were in such a tight window they would have probably have been intercepted. The cbs broadcaster talked about him several minutes after the game and his growth. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MartyClemons Contributor

MartyClemons

Posted
Posted

He played well, gave us a chance to win. I don’t understand the gymnastics some are going through here.

 

Was he Tom Brady? No.

 

is he the QB of our future? Who knows. We’ve got the rest of the season to figure this out. However as bad as the projected 1st rounders have looked lately I am happy to feel slightly less desperate to reach for one. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...