Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young - Good and Bad, what say you?


CLG
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I'm of the opinion that he's been showing it the last three weeks. The two weeks prior to KC weren't statistically great but anyone with eyes could see the improvement. 

I respect your opinion (which is a very positive one, so good for you), but in my mind this was his first good game. I would even say a very good game. The previous two games were less bad than before, but not good compared to the average QB. The bar has been so incredibly low, so any improvement is somehow considered “a good game”.

But again, yesterday was very good, and hopefully he can have more of those.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, electro's horse said:

With the game on the line over two drives, Bruce threw it away on a must make third down, threw a couple bailout DPIs, and completed clutch handoffs. 

finally reached the elusive 7 ypa threshold 

Throwing it away is better than throwing an int in that situation. The Chiefs players had to interfere on those passes for a reason. They were on the money and all would've been completions otherwise. Go touch some grass buddy

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gorillamilitia13 said:

Throwing it away is better than throwing an int in that situation. The Chiefs players had to interfere on those passes for a reason. They were on the money and all would've been completions otherwise. Go touch some grass buddy

The two pointer yeah, but the Thielen in the EZ that moved it to 1st and goal, if that defender had looked for the ball he was in position to get it. He didn't turn around. Which a lot of times they don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was also the first game when BY had more velocity on his throws, I seen a little mustard...

Plus the look of the ball was dang near perfect- balance, spin, height, angle, etc on some throws for the first time. 

That needs to be stated as well with this being his best game in 2 years. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, strato said:

The two pointer yeah, but the Thielen in the EZ that moved it to 1st and goal, if that defender had looked for the ball he was in position to get it. He didn't turn around. Which a lot of times they don't. 

If he doesn't run into Thielen, he catches it for a touchdown. Thielen was in better position than the corner. We don't know who wins the jump ball there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Seriously though, he's certainly been good since he got the starting job back.

I'm still not ready to anoint him as "the future" but he's proven he deserves a little... reconsideration 😕

One smart move that Dan Morgan and Canales did was realize the offensive line needed to be addressed. As Bryce gets more confidence in his protection we should be able to see the true Bryce, good or bad. I am excited about Canales. I truly believe Dan Morgan and Canales have the Panthers trending up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

And that's what it was from the start. Canales wanted bryce to prove it undoubtedly that he is the starter with his work and play. Up to this point you couldn't honestly say he was the best qb on the roster.  And that goes back to last year. 

Until the last few games, you could honestly say he was the worst qb on the roster.  

I am still not sure he is the "guy" but I am a little encouraged by the last few weeks, essentially since the second half of the Denver game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CBDellinger said:

The "I like what I saw yesterday but want to see more" takes are all very reasonable and quite frankly I'm impressed with how balanced the huddle has been after yesterdays game. 

Benching 9 and making him earn it back was a great move by the org.  There are no kings, no anointed ones, just compete for you job on a daily basis and let it rip on Sundays.  lfg.

How did he earn it back? Dalton got in a car accident and couldn't play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Until the last few games, you could honestly say he was the worst qb on the roster.  

I am still not sure he is the "guy" but I am a little encouraged by the last few weeks, essentially since the second half of the Denver game.  

Until the last few games he was probably the worse qb on any roster in the nfl.  He has played much better.  Lots of games left but at this moment if I were GM I would still be drafting best qb available. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...