Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrett Wilson eyeing Bryce Young


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

Isn't he in his 3rd season? Wouldn't you have 2 more years of manageable salary with the 5th year option? If that's the case, then just a matter of draft picks. Gonna have to pay him, but not for another 2 seasons.

Most rookies get their extensions done after their 3rd season, and if you trade for the player at that time, they’re going to force you to give them the extension then, they’ll have all the leverage, especially if you gave up a first to get them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If we gonna draft tmac, might as well just give them the 8th straight up for for Wilson

Literally makes no sense when T-Mac is going to be the better player, he’s younger, and would be on a rookie contract

Just think of it the other way around, if the Jets have the 7th and 8th pick after trading Wilson and T-Mac is there, it means they’re taking him.

why would we want to be on the end of the deal that gets the player with a lower ceiling, is older, and will cost more money over the next 4 years?

the only advantage Wilson has over T-Mac might be during his rookie year while he gets used to the NFL game, but by year 2 it won’t even be a debate who is better.

T-Mac will be a Top 5 WR by the time he needs his 2nd contract, I’m 100% convinced of it

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Literally makes no sense when T-Mac is going to be the better player, he’s younger, and would be on a rookie contract

Just think of it the other way around, if the Jets have the 7th and 8th pick after trading Wilson and T-Mac is there, it means they’re taking him.

why would we want to be on the end of the deal that gets the player with a lower ceiling, is older, and will cost more money over the next 4 years?

the only advantage Wilson has over T-Mac might be during his rookie year while he gets used to the NFL game, but by year 2 it won’t even be a debate who is better.

T-Mac will be a Top 5 WR by the time he needs his 2nd contract, I’m 100% convinced of it

One is opinion the other is a proven comodity

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Literally makes no sense when T-Mac is going to be the better player, he’s younger, and would be on a rookie contract

Just think of it the other way around, if the Jets have the 7th and 8th pick after trading Wilson and T-Mac is there, it means they’re taking him.

why would we want to be on the end of the deal that gets the player with a lower ceiling, is older, and will cost more money over the next 4 years?

the only advantage Wilson has over T-Mac might be during his rookie year while he gets used to the NFL game, but by year 2 it won’t even be a debate who is better.

T-Mac will be a Top 5 WR by the time he needs his 2nd contract, I’m 100% convinced of it

 

I do not see how he makes to 8. But I have seen a couple good board makers list him at 15th 12th and others. 

I feel drafting him with heavy defense would be the best plan for Dan and Panthers. Just need one more elite TE or WR, then load up on D with BPA in mind. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers are not 1 WR away from being a playoff team

they are a full defense away from being a playoff team

this is not the time to throwing away draft capital…I don’t care who it is

…ask Joe Burroughs about the importance of having a defense…the best receiver in the league…a great #2; plus a run game

…and where are they ?  …their happy asses are sitting home 

for once, stay where you are…take the best defensive players available  build this team the right way and don’t look back

…oh yeah, stay out of salary cap hell

 

 

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

HELLLLLLLLLLL NO

Would I love Crosby?

Of course

Are we in any position to give up the multiple 1sts they'd need in return for him?

No fuging way

Too many holes to give up at minimum 2 firsts, and possibly more, that the Raiders would need to trade him away.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

The Panthers are not 1 WR away from being a playoff team

 

 

 

Of course not, but it is a major piece. Especially with how Bryce was slinging it towards the end. We would still have all of FA (we can make a TON of cap space this year) and a loaded 2-7 round picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MORGAN ON PLAY CALLER FOR CANALES   "I think that's really his [Canales'] call," he stated. "I think if he wants to promote somebody into being the play-caller or bring somebody from the outside. We haven't really talked about that. But that is something that I'm sure we'll talk about. We talk about every decision together. If he feels like he needs to add somebody or promote somebody into being the play-caller, then I trust him."  
    • Dude, he cannot see the field, when his feet are not set he throws ducks.   What the fug are you watching?
    • I'm looking at the final drive, and that's where I'm laying the blame at Bryce's feet. Stepping up to the line, 38 seconds left, 3 time outs on the clock. 30 yards needed to attempt a FG. It's not Bryce's job to call the plays, that's DC's and it was terrible play calling.  It's Bryce's job to read what the defense is giving him at the line. The middle of the field is open. Rams are guarding against the deep ball and bringing pressure leaving the middle of the field ripe for the taking. Knowing his line not holding up for long, Bryce should have read the defense, called the audible, and thrown to the middle of the field for 6- 8 yards, like you said, quick slants would have worked. Then run either hurry up or call a TO. We had time. He has to make the adjustments. Any QB has to make the adjustments.  The pass Horn dropped hit his hands but was at his knees. Should he have slid and caught it? Probably. Was the pass a good one? No it wasn't. Both players were at fault, not just Horn. Let's not pretend that Bryce threw a beautiful pass that hit the receiver chest high right in the hands in perfect stride because that damn sure wasn't the throw.  The defense didn't choke away a lead. They never had a real lead. Choking away a lead is being up by multiple scores late in the 4th and losing. We were up by 4 and handed the ball back to a potential MVP with an All pro WR and potential future HoF WR2. One score games in the 4th are a slug fest. 28-3. That's choking away a lead.  I don't solely blame Bryce for the game, but you seem to solely blame the defense for the game because they went to prevent after losing Horn. You are forgetting the short field that the offense left them that led to the early Puka TD on one of our 2 failed 4th down conversions. Our defense has been given very limited resources over the past 3 years while we have tried to put everything possible around Bryce. We added a little bit to the D this year after giving up a NFL record in points last year. Our defense overachieved based on what they've been given to work with. 
×
×
  • Create New...