Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

Only way to beat Mahomes now is to give him the Cam Newton treatment and headhunt him like Denver did in SB 50. 
 

The only difference is the refs will throw the flags but if they rattle the guy into mistakes and getting frustrated that’s a win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OneBadCat said:

Only way to beat Mahomes now is to give him the Cam Newton treatment and headhunt him like Denver did in SB 50. 
 

The only difference is the refs will throw the flags but if they rattle the guy into mistakes and getting frustrated that’s a win. 

Can't touch him.  NFL stock goes down.  Greed is the real Super Bowl Champ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I was gonna ask how Stroud looked in the game but it sounds like it wasn't a great showing.

I did see that Mongolian cluster $#@& of the last red zone appearance and field goal attempt.

He wasn't terrible, but it was a combination of bad oline play, and him holding on to the ball to long.  I thought they should have run the ball a little more.  Mixon had a good game, and a few more runs might have slowed the pass rush down a little bit.  

About half the sacks came in the last 15-18 minutes.  KC turned up the defensive heat and the Texans had  no answer.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Maybe now we'll get to watch an actual real football game and not a WWE level sham because the NFL has a financial interest to pre-determine the winner.

I mean you didn't have to watch, it really should be expected at this point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Maybe now we'll get to watch an actual real football game and not a WWE level sham because the NFL has a financial interest to pre-determine the winner.

Not a conspiracy theorist, but I do think the NFL would "prefer" to see the Lions, Eagles and Bills win the remaining games.

Another Mahomes-Allen championship game would certainly be a ratings bonanza.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

He wasn't terrible, but it was a combination of bad oline play, and him holding on to the ball to long.  I thought they should have run the ball a little more.  Mixon had a good game, and a few more runs might have slowed the pass rush down a little bit.  

About half the sacks came in the last 15-18 minutes.  KC turned up the defensive heat and the Texans had  no answer.  

I've noticed the Bobby Slowik head coaching train seems to have derailed this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Not a conspiracy theorist, but I do think the NFL would "prefer" to see the Lions, Eagles and Bills win the remaining games.

Another Mahomes-Allen championship game would certainly be a ratings bonanza.

I think all this conspiracy stuff is just so much bull.  

No one will ever convince me that the NFL helps any franchise when the two most popular franchises haven't seen a SB in 15 years.  In fact, I don't think the Steelers or Cowboys have made a championship game in that amount of time, but I am not sure about that.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I think all this conspiracy stuff is just so much bull.  

No one will ever convince me that the NFL helps any franchise when the two most popular franchises haven't seen a SB in 15 years.  In fact, I don't think the Steelers or Cowboys have made a championship game in that amount of time, but I am not sure about that.  

So just because the Cowboys and Steelers don't have current dynasties you don't believe it?

Ok, just go ahead and ignore all the horseshit calls that the Patriots and now the Chiefs get. They literally made a new rule after Brady went down that year.

It's not about helping old dynasties. It's about maintaining the current one.

Every decade has had a dynasty franchise. Is that coincidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

He wasn't terrible, but it was a combination of bad oline play, and him holding on to the ball to long.  I thought they should have run the ball a little more.  Mixon had a good game, and a few more runs might have slowed the pass rush down a little bit.  

About half the sacks came in the last 15-18 minutes.  KC turned up the defensive heat and the Texans had  no answer.  

I checked and after the Mixon touchdown, the Texans ran the ball one time for the remainder of the game. It's almost like after the Fairbairn missed XP, the offense played as though they were down multiple scores.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texans have an elite defense and a really good young QB with 3 years left of reasonable cap hit. They have weapons to spare. Just need Diggs and Dell to get healthy. Improve the oline and place kicker, man up and stop making silly mistakes in the playoffs. Nobody's coming to save you. Nobody feels sorry for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...