Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final PFF Grades


mav1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think we all agree we’re happy with the investments at the G positions. Still difficult to look at our WR/TE positions and not wonder what Bryce would look like with elite talents there. 
 

Defense was extremely banged up. It’s ugly to look at though which matches the eye test. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I think we may be incentivized to trade back in the draft. 

Those 6th and 7th round guys are at least NFL caliber guys if you draft decently. We have a lot of non-NFL guys playing, and certainly across the depth chart. Those late round picks will be more valuable to a team such as ours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Shy Tuttle, our starting NT, 119 out of 132

Also none of our safeties crack the top 75

 

fits what we’ve seen all year.

cant wait to upgrade these guys this offseason 

Shy Tuttle was never a good signing and like always they doubled down on the terrible signing by restructuring his contract last year

IMG_2171.jpeg.218242e305f0c3c546ad420e03ff5bd0.jpeg
 

That first number is cap hit and last number is dead money 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

You guys are surprised by this? Most of us have been telling you all along that this team has a serious lack of talent all across the team. It will not improve that much next season. They have a long way to go.

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And again, the TLDR of the above is........ My expectations for T-Mac's rookie season have nothing to do with him and more because of my expectations for the rest of the WR room. I think his 2nd season when we then lose Thielen and replace him by just shifting everyone else up a spot in the pecking order and replace him with an end of the bench guy, is when he explodes for a huge yardage season. XL and Coker wouldn't make a good 1/2 combo with Thielen in the slot.  But T-Mac as the 1 with Thielen in the slot has the real potential to make XL/Coker an actual elite 2/4 combo.  Drafting T-Mac drastically changes the potential impact of those two, if anything, that's the biggest thing taking him did to the offense. Because honestly, how many teams have a 3rd and 4th receiving option as good as XL and Coker?
    • good one though it’s really no joke. I know a few friends and family members that suffer with this condition. 
    • There's nothing normal about a 73 year old dating a 24 year old and a wildly successful NFL coach going to the college level in his twilight years is unprecedented. Yeah, raving success or absolute clown show. We'll see how it plays out on the field but this is why I was always very apprehensive about going after Belichick. The odds of it going the clown show route seem to be increasing by the day.
×
×
  • Create New...