Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Saints Organization helped Protect Pedo-Priests


bLACKpANTHER
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

A religion where it's religious leaders are forbidden to have any type of urges while at the same time being locked in a closet listening to people spill their dirtiest secrets. What could possibly go wrong?

I don't know why anyone would want to protect those that prey on the innocent while spouting their religious server. Just doesn't make sense to me. 

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

 

I don't know why anyone would want to protect those that prey on the innocent while spouting their religious server. Just doesn't make sense to me. 

 

Seems to be very common these days, actually, and applicable to the majority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

Yikes on that take 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

Anything that man touches he tarnishes with corruption.  Never before has religion been weaponized and used by political figures as it has been recently.  According to Pew Research center, and I had a discussion with a Methodist minister about this recently, Gen X-Z are disassociating from the church in record numbers.  Those in power or seeking riches on earth use it to manipulate....It is called menticide in some cases--brainwashing.  To see it for what it is, you have to be objective and willing to see what is under the blanket.  Pew says that 50% of the American churches--mostly evangelical, will not exist in 2050.  For the first time ever, American youth value "common sense" (36%) over spirituality (24%) when making ethical decisions.  So no, the church is not above corruption, greed, and manipulation of the masses.  This is not really new--but it is being exploited now like never before.  Because of more access to the media, Children are less likely to be scared into church and forced to believe the dogma as before.  They see the greed, lying, and manipulation.  This is not mocking Jesus or God--this is exposing those who distort images of Jesus and God so that they can rape, rob, and manipulate you to vote one way or another.  This $50 million dollar preacher knows what I am talking about, as did/does Jim Bakker, Catholic priests, Falwell, Swaggart, etc. 

url.jpg.2ca2675b1cc30a39542cf2ad0cd82a71.jpg

 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

Let’s be honest, this is just a human thing. Pretty sure evil people are in just about every nook and cranny. The bigger the story, the more we hear about it. I don’t think the Nickelodeon/Hollywood pedos are into religion.

Acting as if the removal of religion would turn this world into a wonderful place is very myopic. I don’t think the Catholoc church has assaulted more children than the weird uncles/awful parents of the world, but it’s easier to attack a single entity.

Saints suck and I hope they get folded.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...