Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Myles Garrett Requests Trade from CLE

PantherBoy95

By PantherBoy95,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted

I genuinely wonder what team could even make a trade for Garrett.

Because it's more than just giving up the picks, as if you give up multiple 1sts for him, you HAVE to sign him to an extension to make sure you're keeping him around for years.  And if you have to give him the extension right away, that also means you need a lot of cap room this offseason.

How many teams are a pass rusher away from being a SB contender, have the picks, and have the cap room?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I genuinely wonder what team could even make a trade for Garrett.

Because it's more than just giving up the picks, as if you give up multiple 1sts for him, you HAVE to sign him to an extension to make sure you're keeping him around for years.  And if you have to give him the extension right away, that also means you need a lot of cap room this offseason.

How many teams are a pass rusher away from being a SB contender, have the picks, and have the cap room?

 

 I think the first Mack package is a ballpark- 1st and 3rd.....I feel that's too light. tho

He's got 2 years left and what 29(?), but he's a peppers-like alien, so that age doesn't equal "old". Plus best I know, he's been healthy and no big injuries. The worst thing on the resume was the fake n-word and helmet swing on helmentless player. 

I mean if I was a GM that was very comfy with my roster, Id almost trade too much for him along with giving him new mega deal. If I was 85% sure my team could make the playoff the next two years, I would trade two 1st and maybe even mid-rounder/mid player for him. 

He's a difference maker. He's a big nerd, no off-field BS like many others. I'd try for less, but Id give up kings haul for him. 

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 I think the first Mack package is a ballpark- 1st and 3rd.....I feel that's too light. tho

He's got 2 years left and what 29(?), but he's a peppers-like alien, so that age doesn't equal "old". Plus best I know, he's been healthy and no big injuries. The worst thing on the resume was the fake n-word and helmet swing on helmentless player. 

I mean if I was a GM that was very comfy with my roster, Id almost trade too much for him along with giving him new mega deal. If I was 85% sure my team could make the playoff the next two years, I would trade two 1st and maybe even mid-rounder/mid player for him. 

He's a difference maker. He's a big nerd, no off-field BS like many others. I'd try for less, but Id give up kings haul for him. 

 

I'm not saying he isn't worth trading for, but if he only wants to go to a contender, you then have to have a contender who has the cap space to give him a new deal (as if you give up multiple 1sts for him and don't sign him to an extension immediately, then you're beyond dumb).

I was more genuinely asking the question, as I didn't feel like looking up potential cap space amongst contenders.

I'm sure there are probably a dozen or so teams that would GLADLY give up multiple firsts and give him a monster extension, but they might not be the teams he's thinking can contend in 2025 by adding him and using up their cap space and draft picks to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

I genuinely wonder what team could even make a trade for Garrett.

Because it's more than just giving up the picks, as if you give up multiple 1sts for him, you HAVE to sign him to an extension to make sure you're keeping him around for years.  And if you have to give him the extension right away, that also means you need a lot of cap room this offseason.

How many teams are a pass rusher away from being a SB contender, have the picks, and have the cap room?

 

Watch the Falcons go after him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtm Proficient

jtm

Posted
Posted

This is one of the few players at a critical position that it is worth paying a king's ransom.  I actually think the Panthers will be considered a playoff contender next year, but not a Super Bowl contender.  I doubt this happens, but it would be an amazing pick up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...