Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jalon Walker Interview


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

We could do so much worse. If he's the guy get Deone in round 2 and the front 7 is improved. Notice I didn't say fixed.

If we do not trade back this is my favorite scenario - best for me would be to trade back, still get those 2, and add Xavier Watts.  Then I am extremely happy no matter how else the draft goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia LB Jalon Walker Combine measurements

As an edge: HT: 6010 (2nd percentile) WT: 243 lbs. (6th percentile) Arm: 32” (5th percentile) Hand: 10 1/4" (79th percentile)

As an off-ball LB HT: 6010 (30th) WT: 243 lbs. (63rd) Arm: 32” (37th) Hand: 10 1/4" (90th)

I wish he tested at the combine, only way he has the chance to play edge is if he is a freak of freak athlete. I hate to be that guy but taking him at 8 would be a total reach, seems like an amazing human being and competitor but we need to draft the best player possible not the gritty Carolina guy.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jb2288 said:

We are going to get Walker, Carter, Graham, Johnson, Warren, Williams, or TMac. I dont care any of those guys makes us much better. 

Makes us better is key here. I don’t know if any of our picks last year definitively made us better. Just get someone that can solve 1 problem and we are making progress. 

then pick someone else in round 2 that will do the same. Then, crazy idea, maybe do the same thing a few more times. I know it sounds like rocket science but sometimes people overthink these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he Luke Kuechly?  If he's not 59, we shouldn't be taking him in the top 10.  Yes, he seems like an A+ human being but the real question is "Will he be a difference maker in our scheme?"  The answer must be yes to justify the pick.

If we have doubts about his position, we shouldn't pick him.  Sounds like pundits and insiders are a little uncertain, and that doesn't bode well.  We had another outstanding player and A+ human being here with somewhat ambiguous position fit and it just didn't work out with this coordinator and scheme.  I don't want to see the second coming of Jeremy Chinn.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Is he Luke Kuechly?  If he's not 59, we shouldn't be taking him in the top 10.  Yes, he seems like an A+ human being but the real question is "Will he be a difference maker in our scheme?"  The answer must be yes to justify the pick.

If we have doubts about his position, we shouldn't pick him.  Sounds like pundits and insiders are a little uncertain, and that doesn't bode well.  We had another outstanding player and A+ human being here with somewhat ambiguous position fit and it just didn't work out with this coordinator and scheme.  I don't want to see the second coming of Jeremy Chinn.

If Luke is the comparison, then we are likely doomed.  Players like him come around only once in a while.  

We need a infusion of talent on defense and the first round is only one part of it.  If he turns out be to be a Shaq Thompson, but we also add a Charles Johnson or Mike Rucker and a Mike Minter in later rounds, I will be happy.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...