Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 NFL Draft - Day 3 Discussion


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Bad attitude or not, it doesn't make Dillon Gabriel worth a 3rd round pick. 

Do you want the guy that can be coached or the guy who thinks he already knows more than you. It’s perfectly clear that teams hated his attitude. The self entitlement. The sheer nepotism and media circus that comes along with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Well when you set yourself up for this kind of attention this is what will happen. 

That doesn't excuse someone being an asshole. Sanders did not make anyone in the media keep making this a spectacle(long before the draft, I mean). He may not have shied away from it but that doesn't excuse the action.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

I know there is no way in hell the Panthers would take him and all the circus it would create here but Sanders is becoming an asset worth taking if only to develop as the backup and trade later.  He is too talented to be here in the 4th round.

He's gonna be there in the 7th round Howard and Ewers coming off next 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yes but you are literally making my point for me. Tank Dell has missed 11 of 25 career games with injuries. Not minor injuries either. Concussion, broken leg and now a blown out knee. 

It's not that Johnson isn't a good football player. Not at all. It's that he might rarely see the field for you.

Now, all that being said, he IS the type of player that makes sense in the 5th round or lower.

I was responding to the small size without straight line speed comment. Being smaller definitely makes you more prone to injuries when you're getting volume catches. He probably wouldn't be that in Carolina. But to be honest, I'd take Tank Dell's 7 games a season over anything our 4th/5th receivers bring to the table over 16 games a season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

If you don't think he's a starter for you, that means he's a backup. So then, you have to decide what his potential ceiling is, and then evaluate how well you think he'd do as a backup. Unfortunately, he doesn't come off as a backup and I think the sad reality is his father's media circus turns people off from that. 


Exactly. Sanders is like Cam in his final years as a FA.

Not good enough to start but too cocky and distracting to be a backup.

There is just no upside to him on a team with an established starter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finishing the draft without having given away multiple future picks is a different, interesting approach this year. I heard we moved up a few spots and instantly assumed (based on this organizations history) that we gave up three 1st’s and two 2nd’s to move up four spots in the third. That’s usually how this team does business on draft day. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

I was responding to the small size without straight line speed comment. Being smaller definitely makes you more prone to injuries when you're getting volume catches. He probably wouldn't be that in Carolina. But to be honest, I'd take Tank Dell's 7 games a season over anything our 4th/5th receivers bring to the table over 16 games a season.

Yeah, as long as you don't get roped up in a Horn sized contract at the end of that.

Availability is an ability, as the saying goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I know there is no way in hell the Panthers would take him and all the circus it would create here but Sanders is becoming an asset worth taking if only to develop as the backup and trade later.  He is too talented to be here in the 4th round.

The issue is teams are clearly sending a message they don't believe he can be a good backup. I guess we'll see if that holds as his talent far out paces the rest of the draft board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...