Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Read Optional:Was Bryce Young's leap for real?


lumbeecheraw75
 Share

Recommended Posts

Another reddit find, really good  and in depth read.

https://www.readoptional.com/p/was-bryce-youngs-leap-for-real

Some choice quotes (taken directly from reddit, but much more in the article itself)

* "The base plays were variations of wide-zone and duo, with the promise of boots and play-action shots to follow, just as Canales described at the Combine. But the run game couldn’t get rolling. It was too rudimentary, and the new interior didn’t generate enough push. In those opening two weeks, the Panthers *lost* a wince-inducing -0.74 EPA/play on early down runs, an almost impossibly bad return. Forget any play-action shots, either. Young was left to pick apart defenses with two options down the field\[...\] It was the worst-case scenario: a coach hell-bent on a power-run game, limiting the number of eligibles available in the passing game, and putting Young, a quarterback-as-point-guard by traits, in a stand-in-and-deliver role more suited to Sam Darnold or Jared Goff. It was an awful plan, and the Panthers were roundly shellacked."


* "When I did the podcast rounds previewing the Panthers’ offense before last season, I sounded like someone who had just returned from his first LSD trip. I was talking about the Panthers reimagining football, about Canales building something fresh in the pro football landscape from disparate ideas. But Young is such an outlier by the historic standards of top quarterbacks that he demands such a revolution\[..\] A new, space-age offense is what \[was\] required. If not the designs themselves, then pushing the basic mechanics of a modern passing game out to its outermost limit. Chiefly: getting into empty as early and often as possible. Allow Young to see the contours of the defense. Force them to reveal their hand if they’re sending extra heat. And give him all five eligible to play with, and more space to move and manipulate the pocket as he sees fit. Don’t put the training wheels on; let him create his own schematic reality."


* "One key change: Canales embraced empty. He kept a bunch of his heavier sets to try to spark his run-game, which *was* more effective as the season progressed. But Canales let Young go cook in his more natural habitat in the passing attack. Young finished fourth in the league in empty sets last season despite starting only 12 games\[...\] The trust is what leaps out from the tape. Canales, ever the confidence builder, *trusted* Young to dictate his own rhythm from empty — using it to set the tempo of the offense, with Young getting the ball out sharp and quickly on early downs, as well as a launching pad to explosive plays down the field."


* "Those shifts — in the scheme and his mentality — unlocked the player we saw in the second half of the season. From Week Eight onwards, Young ranked 17^(th) in the RBSDM composite, sitting above Jayden Daniels and right behind Geno Smith and Matthew Stafford. His CPOE leapt to 15^(th), ranking above Brock Purdy, Josh Allen, Justin Herbert, Jordan Love, and Daniels. And all while his average intended air yards hung steady, right on nine yards, one of the highest in the league. He became more accurate, decisive, and potent. Only Lamar Jackson finished with a higher blend of CPOE *and* average intended air yards."

Edited by lumbeecheraw75
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From where he started, it was a leap. In terms of NFL QB play, it was hardly average. We got so used to the team being so utterly and completely terrible that any improvement seemed massive. 

He next step is average. It isn't Top 10. It's Top 16. If we tank again this year, he is probably gone. 

At which point I say we trade for someone on a favorable contract with high upside. 

But that's just me. 

  • Pie 4
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been a Bryce supporter since Day 1. I wanted him over CJ Stroud, admittedly. And even I think that Bryce has to show out this year. I'm sure he knows it too. It's year 3, they have acquired a lot of help for him and molded the offense to his strengths. Now he has to deliver. 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Naw fug that, his next step IS top 10 or he should be gone. He's the #1 overall pick and we traded a ransom for him. There's no more excuses anymore. We built him a top 10 o-line and used high draft picks on WRs in back to back years for him. 


Is it really a top 10 OL? I haven’t seen anyone rank it that high.

They have not been good in the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

From where he started, it was a leap. In terms of NFL QB play, it was hardly average. We got so used to the team being so utterly and completely terrible that any improvement seemed massive. 

He next step is average. It isn't Top 10. It's Top 16. If we tank again this year, he is probably gone. 

At which point I say we trade for someone on a favorable contract with high upside. 

But that's just me. 

It was above average.  Statistically you could say it was average, but when it comes to qbr under pressure, big time throws, big time throws under pressure, etc he was top 5.  They werent really calling games to try to get him to put up huge passing numbers last season.  Im not saying he was great the second half of last season, but he was definitely well above average.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will definitely find out this year, assuming he stays healthy. I don't want him to be benched or replaced by Dalton in any game. I want a full 17 game sample size of how well he does in his 3rd year in the league and 2nd year in Canales' system. 

It's either put up or shut up time. I think he either has to play consistently very good, or he can be average if we're winning. If he's bad enough for us to pick high enough up in the draft to replace him in a loaded 2026 QB draft,  then he'd be replaced imo.

The exact criteria for his success is a little harder to define. Something like 3000+ passing 20+ TDs  12 or less INTs, statistically would be nice.  Or if he has underwhelming stats/performance,  getting to or winning a playoff game could keep him rolling otw to a cap busting contract as well . The Panthers have been so starved for winning seasons or playoffs over the last 7 years, I don't think they'll change any major parts if we finally get back to winning.

I'm personally not sold on Bryce until we either have a winning/playoff season, or he consistently plays very well for an entire  NFL season. He hasn't done that yet.

 

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From camp reports by the Athletic, Robert Mays said it looks like we're expanding the run calls this year.  So it sounds like Canales had a bit of a slow roll with his system. 

He was doing the same at Tampa but then their OL got depleted midseason in 2023 and he had to stay a bit vanilla in the run game.  They know they can't stay vanilla much longer.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tbe said:


Is it really a top 10 OL? I haven’t seen anyone rank it that high.

They have not been good in the run game.

We are 4th in the league in OL spending. Either way we are doing more for the overall group than we have in many years.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

From where he started, it was a leap. In terms of NFL QB play, it was hardly average. We got so used to the team being so utterly and completely terrible that any improvement seemed massive. 

He next step is average. It isn't Top 10. It's Top 16. If we tank again this year, he is probably gone. 

At which point I say we trade for someone on a favorable contract with high upside. 

But that's just me. 

Pivoting from Bryce after a disaster year(which is the only way that happens) is very unlikely to entail any sort of trade option. I mean, what "favorable contract with high upside" would there even be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... some are going too far. With mostly young and unproven receivers/TEs. Bryce should show that he's more consistent this season, but next season is when we should expect a huge step. Mostly dependent on his supporting cast. 2027 is when the decision should be made. Need to have realistic expectations. It's too hard to find a franchise QB to let a possible one go because of feelings. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always fun to see articles linked and immediately be able to tell who from the replies even bothered reading it. 😛

The mention about going to more empty sets and why now makes Canales' tendency to go five wide after a 1st down run that went for a first down. I'd get frustrated seeing the run game work only to move away from it, but now that I know it was part of trying to rebuild his confidence and catering scheme to the players (I know folks aren't used to this, but Canales and Evero have both shown early on that they won't force their scheme if the players accel in other ways).

Moving away from heavier sets and giving Bryce more options takes advantage of his much praised processing ability. Giving Jonathon Mingo an extra 1.5sec in his route wasn't exactly going to get him any more open.

Now, after the recent SI video, it sounds like coach and QB have found a happy medium to the point of Bryce leading meetings to teach concepts (and let his teammates know his preferences and tendencies based on what he sees). There's still going to be growing pains, especially on the recently patched together defense, but there's finally some competence it seems in the locker room.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah... some are going too far. With mostly young and unproven receivers/TEs. Bryce should show that he's more consistent this season, but next season is when we should expect a huge step. Mostly dependent on his supporting cast. 2027 is when the decision should be made. Need to have realistic expectations. It's too hard to find a franchise QB to let a possible one go because of feelings. 

Tbf we just let 2 possible franchise qbs go ( darnold and baker) and passed over 1 in the draft ( stroud) bc of feelings. Feelings matter a lot for this team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...