Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle trask released by bucs

fanpanther

By fanpanther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Finally, somebody with a set that is willing to say the quiet part out loud.

Idk why we have posters claiming to care about evaluating the down roster guys or acting like a developmental QB3 is the only thing between the team and a postseason run. The honest thing to do is just say with their chest that they think we are doomed with Bryce instead of pretending they give af about getting better tape for WR12.

They are still trying to develop qb1. Qb2 doesn't need development. The qb3 position only runs the scout team in practice.  Until qb1 is settled the qb3 position is just an afterthought. Get use to it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

They are still trying to develop qb1. Qb2 doesn't need development. The qb3 position only runs the scout team in practice.  Until qb1 is settled the qb3 position is just an afterthought. Get use to it.

Meanwhile, Davis Mills is all the competition Houston needs. /s

If only they were a dynastic team like the Raiders who have the infallible Aidan O'Connell and now the Kenny Pick6 in the room. That's a team built for back-to-back-to-back Super Bowls. 😛

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Meanwhile, Davis Mills is all the competition Houston needs. /s

If only they were a dynastic team like the Raiders who have the infallible Aidan O'Connell and now the Kenny Pick6 in the room. That's a team built for back-to-back-to-back Super Bowls. 😛

The reality is that teams don't have 3 qb's because they are "developing" for the future. The only development going on is qb1 unless they are a 5 plus year vet. They bring in qbs in the offseason as a camp arm that may upgrade your backup or to replace the starter if there isn't one. If your team needs a starter the draft is the best way, not free agency. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersGTI Mentor

PanthersGTI

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, frankw said:

"How dare you want a competitive QB room! Say it with your chest haters!"

As if it's completely far fetched to suggest Bryce Young may struggle at some point.

The Office Reaction GIF

 

He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Shotgun said:

Because we know who QB1 and QB2 are. lol

Agree, but no decent QB will accept QB3 money.  If 1 sucks and 2 goes down, they will go back to 1.  If 1 goes down and 2 sucks, they will ride with 2.  If 1 and 2 go down they will call a QB pff they street before they start 3

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Panthers Top 30 Visits and Draft Tracker

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • strato
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By strato · Posted

      We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • flagfootballcoach28
      Mike Kaye: “I would keep a pretty close eye on {KC Concepcion}.”

      By flagfootballcoach28 · Posted

      I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...