Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Rico Dowdle is rumored to be open for trade by the Panthers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Here’s a quick look at recent NFL compensatory picks that were tied (at least in part) to teams losing a running back in free agency:

  • 2019 NFL Draft (for 2018 FA):
    • Patriots — Round 6 (for Dion Lewis leaving for the Titans). Over the Cap

  • 2022 NFL Draft (for 2021 FA):
    • Packers — Round 7 (for Jamaal Williams leaving for the Lions). SI+1

  • 2023 NFL Draft (for 2022 FA):
    • Cardinals — Round 6 (for Chase Edmonds leaving for the Dolphins). Over the Cap+2Arizona Cardinals+2

  • 2024 NFL Draft (for 2023 FA):
    • No RB departures ended up producing a listed comp pick in the NFL’s 2024 release/evaluations. Over the Cap+1

  • 2025 NFL Draft (for 2024 FA):
    • Cowboys — projected/awarded comp picks in the 2025 cycle included one attributable in part to Tony Pollard’s departure (commonly projected as a Round 6 value).

We probably won’t get any comps regardless as we have a lot of needs and a good bit of cap space.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay here is the thing, those were bad defenses he tore up. Tne holes were large. 
He was great don’t get me wrong. It’s just that I see teams focusing on shutting our run down and forcing Bryce to beat them. 
I think they will be able to and then what is he? 

Nutshell, he probably won’t want to re-sign, the run game is going to be shut down a lot, maybe the smart move is listen to offers and if we get a no brainer take it. 
 

Giants need a RB. Would you trade him for Jameis? 

Edited by strato
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Look I realize we're not a legit playoff contender.  But this a 4-4 team and Bryce's make or break year.  If we're stripping the team for parts, then go ahead and fire Canales and cut Bryce because that's basically what's being chosen.

If we're doing that we might as well clean house and start all over at this point. No more half measures. New GM who chooses his own head coach who chooses his own staff and an all new QB room.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Paa Langfart said:

Oh wee mayne.  Tell me this isn't true.

This year, yes.

I am incredibly weary of over-investment at RB--particularly via FA. 

As much as we all seem to like Rico right now, it's not smart to throw a contract at him.  I lean into the trade side.  We already have too much invested in a rather unspectacular but solid guy in Hubbard. 

He had a good enough 2024 to give a contract to, but not enough to make him the GUY.  So we brought in Rico who has shown up.  but you don't just go, "okay, sure, let's give a 28 year old Dowdle a 2-3 year deal.

Etienne, Brooks are the annual dice throws that are honestly fine by me.  The 2nd was stretching it for JB, but I think it's perfectly fine to keep slinging picks at a RB.  You never know when you stumble upon a Irving, Achane, Kyren later or you're in position to land a Gibbs type.  

These guys phase out, come age 28-30 they're on the downturn unless you found yourself a Barkley or Henry.  

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Chuba makes more sense if only looking at player vs player. Chuba is not getting traded given his contract. 

 

He is unlikely to be someone anyone else wants, but he isn't particularly valuable to us right now, compared to Rico.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If I was told we could sign Rico on a cheap 1 year deal, use him up while Chuba was hurt and grab some wins with him and then flip him for a pick I’d be thrilled. We don’t need to be shortsighted like we have in the past. 

I'd argue that blowing up the season for a 4th round pick is pretty short sighted.  Rico is the most productive offensive player we have.  Unless you're in favor of firing everyone, I don't see how you can think this is rational.  If Canales is going to work they need to build something this season.  Not strip it for day 3 picks.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We aren’t a playoff team and he walks for nothing after this year. Any player that’s in his last year and we don’t plan on extending should be worth looking at for picks. 

As crazy as it is we are still in the playoff hunt as far as the team is concerned. Yes, fans have written playoffs off since week 1. But that's not how the team does or should see it.

It depends what teams would offer, but I don't think his loss this year is worth a 5th or a 6th. I'm not even sure I'd do a 4th (but definitely higher than that). And I doubt anyone gives us more than that...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...